B Gravity waves And entanglement quesro

Justice Hunter
Messages
98
Reaction score
7
So this is going to sound ridiculous, but I want to push my curiosity to the limit.

Gravitational waves propogate at the speed of light, like most things in the universe.

My first question is : is this propogation slowed down by anything? The Higgs field perhaps?

2nd question ; I assume that gravity waves act like other waves, and that they are susseptible to interference, and perhaps other quantum mechanical effects. Does this mean that excitations in a gravity field (graviton a) be entangled with another excitation in the field?

P.S. Sorry about spelling/grammar errors. I'm on a phone.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The propagation of gravity waves is likely slowed down by mass carrying objects in the same way that light waves are slowed down by charge carrying objects. The gravitational energy causes the masses to oscillate, which in turn, produce minute secondary gravity waves at a time delay. This, with the main gravity wave, gives the effect of a decrease in speed in matter. In that sense, you could imagine a planet or a gas giant acting like a lens for gravity waves, but the index of refraction would be so close to that of a vacuum, there would be likely no observable effect. Plus, it might be that absorption would dominate over refraction, in which case the planet would be like an absorbing medium.

If real gravitons exist, then it is certainly possible for them to be entangled. If the two gravitons can interact, even indirectly, than that interaction could create entanglement. Also, if there were a kind of event that produces pairs of gravitons, those gravitons are likely entangled due to energy and momentum conservation.
 
  • Like
Likes Justice Hunter and Buzz Bloom
Justice Hunter said:
My first question is : is this propogation slowed down by anything? The Higgs field perhaps?
We do not have a proper quantum theory of gravity so far, but there is no indication that the Higgs field would give gravitons a mass.
Justice Hunter said:
Does this mean that excitations in a gravity field (graviton a) be entangled with another excitation in the field?
The coupling is way too weak for such an experiment, but theoretically with much stronger gravity, it would be possible.
 
  • Like
Likes Justice Hunter
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
From $$0 = \delta(g^{\alpha\mu}g_{\mu\nu}) = g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} + g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu}$$ we have $$g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} = -g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \,\, . $$ Multiply both sides by ##g_{\alpha\beta}## to get $$\delta g_{\beta\nu} = -g_{\alpha\beta} g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \qquad(*)$$ (This is Dirac's eq. (26.9) in "GTR".) On the other hand, the variation ##\delta g^{\alpha\mu} = \bar{g}^{\alpha\mu} - g^{\alpha\mu}## should be a tensor...
Back
Top