GRE Scores & Admissions Decisions: Physics General & General Tests

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the role of GRE scores in graduate admissions, particularly in physics. Participants express frustration over the necessity of standardized testing despite strong GPAs, with one noting a 3.95 GPA as evidence of capability. It is suggested that GRE scores primarily serve as elimination criteria rather than comparative metrics. A strong GPA and research experience are emphasized as more critical factors in admissions decisions. The GRE provides a uniform assessment, allowing applicants from varying grading systems to demonstrate their abilities. While some believe that UC schools may prioritize the GRE General test more than others, the consensus is that a well-rounded application, including strong academic records and research, can mitigate the impact of lower GRE scores. Overall, applicants are encouraged to focus on their strengths and not let GRE scores overshadow their accomplishments.
HunterR
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello all,
Does anyone have any experience with admissions committee decisions regarding GRE scores? How much weight (over GPA or even research experience) do they carry on the admissions decision? (Physics General and/or General test)
I have very strong feelings against the GRE's. I find it ridiculous that after earning a 3.95 GPA in Physics I have to "show" again I'm capable of "doing" physics. But that's just my opinion.
Any comments?

All the best,
HunterR :smile:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In my opinion, the GRE scores are used only as criteria for elimination, and not criteria for comparison. If either of your GRE scores are terrible, you will not be accepted, but I don't think the score itself goes into some kind of a formula to determine your qualification. More important are your research experience and references/recommendations.

The reason you are taking the GRE physics test, despite having a 3.95 GPA is that the GRE is a standardized test that everyone takes and allows for a uniform asessment. If someone comes from a department that is draconian with grading, then s/he has an opportunity to prove that the GPA being low is a false indicator, by scoring high on the GRE. The opposite holds true too. If you have a fantastic GPA but do terribly on the GRE, then your GPA starts to look suspicious.

And this may only be a rumor, but I've heard that the UC schools give a little more importance to the GRE General test than most other.
 


Hello HunterR,

I completely understand your frustration with the GRE scores and their role in the admissions decision. While they do carry some weight, they are not the only factor that admissions committees consider. Your GPA and research experience are also important factors in the decision-making process.

In my experience, a strong GPA in physics and a solid research background can outweigh a lower GRE score. Admissions committees are looking for well-rounded candidates who not only have a strong academic record but also have the potential to excel in their graduate studies.

That being said, it is always important to aim for a competitive GRE score to strengthen your application. But do not let the GRE scores discourage you or overshadow your other accomplishments. Admissions committees understand that standardized tests do not always accurately reflect a student's potential and abilities.

Best of luck in your admissions journey! Don't let the GRE scores bring you down. Keep highlighting your strengths and showcasing your passion for physics in your application.
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
6K
Back
Top