Great Pyramid of Cheops (Center of Mass Problem)

  • Thread starter Thread starter spank_fusion
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mass Pyramid
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the center of mass and work required to lift the blocks of the Great Pyramid of Cheops. The original height of the center of mass above the base needs to be determined using integration techniques, considering the pyramid's dimensions and uniform density. For calculating the work, the center of mass height is used as the distance for lifting all blocks, but the integration must account for the varying heights of each mass element. Clarification is provided that the integrals for mass and height are not the same, emphasizing the need for careful calculation. The conversation highlights the complexities of multi-dimensional integration in physics problems.
spank_fusion
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
The Great Pyramid of Cheops at El Gizeh, Egypt, had a height H = 148.6 m before its topmost stone fell. Its base is a square with edge length L = 227.4 m. Its volume V is equal (L^2)H/3. Assuming that it has uniform density p(rho) = 1.8e3 kg/m^3.
(a) What is the original height of its center of mass above the base?
(b) What is the work required to lift all the blocks into place from the base level?

Kay, so I'm good with finding center of mass in one dimension, but in two and three dimensions, it is confusing the hell out of me. Am I supposed to integrate? If so, what? I just need a push in the right direction (I think).

Also, for finding the work, I'm guessing I'm supposed to use the CM height as the distance for all of the blocks traveled, but I'm not sure about that either. Any help would be appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, you need to integrate.

If z is the height above the base of an element of mass of thickness dz then the element of mass at height z is proportional to (h-z)^2 dz. You need to find the average of z which means summing over all elements of mass - and dividing by the total mass.
 
But wouldn't that just be dividing the total mass by the total mass? I'm really confused. I need to have the answer tonight, so if anyone can give me a bit more information, it would really help.
 
No. The integrand of the integral in the numerator will have an additional factor of z in it so the integrals are not the same.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top