Great, thank you for the feedback!

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the physics of a lorry traveling up a slope with specific parameters. Participants calculate the component of the lorry's weight down the slope, the work done against resistive forces, and the power developed by the lorry. There is confusion regarding the calculations for power and the braking distance on a slope compared to a horizontal road. Clarifications are provided on the correct values and formulas to use for these calculations. The conversation concludes with participants confirming their understanding and calculations.
Peter G.
Messages
439
Reaction score
0
The angle of the slope is 4.8 with the horizontal and the weight of the lorry is 2.4 x 105. A resistive force of 1.2 x 104 down the slope acts on the lorry as it travels up the slope at a constant speed of 15 m/s

(a) Show that the component of the weight of the lorry down the slope is 2.0 x 104:
(b) Calculate the rate at which the truck does work against the resistive forces:
(c) Calculate the power developed by the lorry as it travels up the slope:
(d) Calculate the rate at of gain of potential energy of the lorry:
(e) State and explain how the braking distance of the lorry up the slope compares with that on a horizontal road at the same speed:

The way question c and d are written confuse me a bit. These were my attempts but I am unsure whether they are right or not:

(a) I always have difficulty determining the angle when dividing the components of weight, but: I figured: sin 4.8 x 2.4 x 105 = 2.0 x 104

(b) P = Force x Velocity, P = 1.2 x 104 x 15 = 180,000 J/s

(c) Constant force, hence, force back - resistive forces and the component of weight parallel to the slope - equal the force of the engine, thus: P = F x v, P = 252,000 x 15 = 3,780,000 W

(d) m x g x h, thus: 2.0 x 105 x (sin 4.8 x 15) = 301,240.2 J/s

(e) I think the braking distance will be reduced. On the horizontal road, the resistive forces are equal, provided, as stated in the question, the speed is the same, but, on the slope, there is also the component of the weight parallel to the truck pushing it back which will reduce the braking distance

Thanks in advance,
Peter G.
 

Attachments

  • Physics.jpg
    Physics.jpg
    3.2 KB · Views: 478
Physics news on Phys.org
Peter G. said:
(c) Constant force, hence, force back - resistive forces and the component of weight parallel to the slope - equal the force of the engine, thus: P = F x v, P = 252,000 x 15 = 3,780,000 W

Check the value you used to the force.

ehild
 
Oh, thanks! I think it should be 1.2 x 104 + 2.0 x 104, hence, 32000. Then, 32000 x 15 = 480,000. Is that it? :redface:
 
I think so...

ehild
 
Ok cool. And the other questions seem O.K too?

Peter G.
 
Peter G. said:
Ok cool. And the other questions seem O.K too?

Peter G.

Yes.

ehild
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top