Greenland ice cap may be melting at triple speed

AI Thread Summary
The Greenland ice cap is melting at an alarming rate, with recent studies indicating a fivefold increase in ice loss from its southeastern region over the past two years. This research, published in the journal Science, highlights the potential impact on global sea levels, estimating an annual contribution of 0.56 millimeters from Greenland's melting ice. The study, part of the GRACE mission, emphasizes that the accelerated melting could disrupt ocean currents, particularly the North Atlantic Current, which may lead to colder winters in Western Europe. The findings are supported by advanced satellite measurements that provide detailed insights into the sources of ice mass changes. Overall, the rapid melting of Greenland's ice poses significant implications for climate patterns and sea level rise worldwide.
Mk
Messages
2,039
Reaction score
4
http://www.utexas.edu/opa/news/2006/08/engineering10.html
The loss of ice has been occurring about five times faster from Greenland’s southeastern region in the past two years than in the previous year and a half. The dramatic changes were documented during a University of Texas at Austin study of Greenland’s mass between 2002 and 2005.

The study was published today in the journal Science. Related results on the significant loss of ice from Antarctica were published in Science in March by other researchers participating in the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) mission. The GRACE mission is funded by NASA and the German Aerospace Center, and led by Aerospace Engineering Professor Byron Tapley at the university.

“Our latest GRACE findings are the most complete measurement of ice mass loss for Greenland,” said Tapley, director of the university’s Center for Space Research (CSR) and holder of the Clare Cockrell Williams Centennial Chair in Engineering. “The sobering thing to see is that the whole process of glacial melting is stepping up much more rapidly than before.”

Antarctica is considered the largest, and Greenland the second largest, reservoir of fresh water on Earth, with the latter containing about 10 percent of the world’s fresh water. Melting of ice from these two regions is expected to impact sea level and ocean circulation, and potentially the future of climates worldwide.

The Greenland study, for example, suggests that the amount of fresh water contributed from the melting of its ice sheet could add 0.56 millimeters annually to a global increase in sea levels, higher than all previously published measurements.

“These findings are consistent with the most recent independent measurements of Greenland’s mass done by other techniques like satellite radar interferometry, but in this case they provide a direct measure of ice-mass changes,” said Geology Professor Clark Wilson, a co-author on the latest Science article who helped analyze the estimates for Greenland. Wilson chairs the Department of Geological Sciences at the university and holds the Wallace E. Pratt Professorship in Geophysics.

Within the subpolar zone that includes Greenland, the rapid rise in meltwater along its eastern coast could add to other warming-related factors believed to be weakening the counterclockwise flow of the North Atlantic Current. For instance, the increased meltwater could change how more buoyant fresh water mixes with salt water in a branch of this flow called the Norwegian Current. This change could lower the temperatures of water, and thus wind, that travels past the west coast of Ireland and Great Britain.

That ocean temperature change would occur because the current might not move northward past Norway before returning to more southerly latitudes. Warmer, southerly waters would be stalled from moving northward if that happened, resulting in chillier winters in parts of Western Europe.

“If enough fresh water enters the Norwegian Current,” Tapley said, “and you interrupt return flow, then there could be climate effects in Europe.”

The twin GRACE satellites provide the most comprehensive monthly estimates of Greenland’s ice-mass balance. The satellites are sensitive to the gravitational pull of mass changes on Earth, which produce micrometer-scale variations in the distance (137 miles or 220 kilometers) that separates the two satellites as they fly in formation over Earth.

Lead author Jianli Chen, a CSR research scientist, developed a method to improve the effective spatial resolution of mass change estimates. The method used the known locations of major glaciers as information in estimating the sources of mass change.

“By using this special filtering procedure,” Chen said, “we teased out additional details of mass changes in Greenland along its Southeastern and Northeastern shores separately.”

The estimates showed that 69 percent of the ice-mass loss in recent years came from eastern Greenland. Of the 57 cubic miles (239 cubic kilometers) of water mass lost on average each year, 39 cubic miles (164 cubic kilometers) were from the eastern shoreline. More than half of that eastern loss involved ice from the glacier complex in southeast Greenland.
''Science (DOI:10.1126/science.1129007)''
http://www.newscientist.com/data/images/ns/cms/dn9717/dn9717-1_464.jpg
I like this one. Well, I like maps. I found it interesting in Northern Canada readings show +5.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Earth sciences news on Phys.org
Here's a good one also for sea level rise:http://sealevel.colorado.edu/current/sl_ib.jpg
 
The link doesn't work.
 
On August 10, 2025, there was a massive landslide on the eastern side of Tracy Arm fjord. Although some sources mention 1000 ft tsunami, that height represents the run-up on the sides of the fjord. Technically it was a seiche. Early View of Tracy Arm Landslide Features Tsunami-causing slide was largest in decade, earthquake center finds https://www.gi.alaska.edu/news/tsunami-causing-slide-was-largest-decade-earthquake-center-finds...
Hello, I’m currently writing a series of essays on Pangaea, continental drift, and Earth’s geological cycles. While working on my research, I’ve come across some inconsistencies in the existing theories — for example, why the main pressure seems to have been concentrated in the northern polar regions. So I’m curious: is there any data or evidence suggesting that an external cosmic body (an asteroid, comet, or another massive object) could have influenced Earth’s geology in the distant...
Back
Top