Green's Theorem and Line Integral

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves evaluating a line integral using Green's Theorem over a rectangular contour defined by the vertices (0,0), (0,1), (3,0), and (3,1). The original poster attempts to compute the integral directly and through Green's Theorem but encounters discrepancies in the results.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the evaluation of the integral directly and using Green's Theorem, noting the need to consider the direction of the contour. Questions arise regarding the positive orientation of the contour and how it affects the calculations.

Discussion Status

Some participants provide clarifications about the positive orientation of the contour, explaining that it should be counter-clockwise. There is acknowledgment of the confusion regarding the limits of integration and the direction of traversal along the contour.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of adhering to the convention of positive orientation in Green's Theorem and how it impacts the evaluation of the integral. The original poster expresses uncertainty about where their calculations went wrong, indicating a need for further exploration of the problem setup.

EV33
Messages
192
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


[tex]\oint[/tex]xydx+x^2dy

C is the rectangle with vertices (0,0),(0,1),(3,0), and (3,1)

Evaluate the integral by two methods: (a) directly and (b) using green's theorem.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


Evaluating the integral directly:

c1: y=0,x=t,dx=dt,dy=o {0[tex]\leq[/tex]t[tex]\leq[/tex]3}
c2: x=3, y=t, dx=0, dy=dt {0[tex]\leq[/tex]t[tex]\leq[/tex]1}
c3: y=1, dy=0, x=t, dx=dt {0[tex]\leq[/tex]t[tex]\leq[/tex]3}
c4: x=0, dx=0, y=t, dy=dt {0[tex]\leq[/tex]t[tex]\leq[/tex]1}

So I got c1 and c4 being the integral of zero which is just zero.

Then for c2 and c3...

[tex]\int[/tex]9dt {t:0[tex]\leq[/tex]t[tex]\leq[/tex]1} +[tex]\int[/tex]tdt {t:0[tex]\leq[/tex]t[tex]\leq[/tex]3}=27/2Then trying to use green's theorem:
[tex]\int[/tex][tex]\int[/tex]xdydx=[tex]\int[/tex]xdx=9/2

{y:0[tex]\leq[/tex]y[tex]\leq[/tex]1}
{x:0[tex]\leq[/tex]x[tex]\leq[/tex]3}

I am not sure where I messed up but I know I did because both of my answers should be the same. If someone could point me in the right direction, it would be much appreciated. Thank you for your time.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sorry if it looks a little confusing. I didn't intend on my function being where my top limit of integration would be.
 
You need to take into account the direction of the contour. You want to enclose the area going in the counter-clockwise direction.
 
I don't really understand the positive orientation part of green's theorem. How do you even know what direction it is oriented?
 
If you have a region enclosed by a contour, the convention is that the positive orientation is when the contour encloses the region in the counter-clockwise direction. It's similar to the convention we use that a positive angle is measured going in the counter-clockwise direction from the x-axis. There's nothing inherently positive about it. It's just that everyone agrees that that's what they mean by "positive."

In this problem, if you start at the origin, the positive sense of the contour would be going from (0,0) to (3,0) to (3,1) to (0,1) and finally back to the origin. So when you calculate C3, you have to go from (3,1) to (0,1), otherwise your answer for that leg comes out with the opposite sign and you don't get the cancellation you need.
 
Ok. That makes perfect sense now. Thank you so much.
 

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
11K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K