Griffiths (electrodynamics) problem 4.19, part b

phrankle
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
When finding the polarization of the dielectric portion between the two plates using P=\epsilon_{0} X_{e}E, why would we use the E-field in the air portion (as is done in the solutions manual and here: http://www.getofftheinternet.net/s_10077.pdf ) instead of solving for the E-field in the dielectric portion and using that to find P?

Also, why is the surface charge density over the air segment equal to the TOTAL surface charge density? Isn't it the free charge density in this problem? I'm pretty confused, so any help will be massively appreciated.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
P and E0 contribute to E in the material by vector summing. P is the part of E that is due to the charge separation, and E0 is the reason for the charge separation.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top