Griffiths' Notation for Vector from Source to Field Point

  • Thread starter Thread starter radiogaga35
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Griffiths Notation
AI Thread Summary
Griffiths' notation for the vector from the source point to the field point, referred to as a "squiggly r," simplifies complex expressions in his electromagnetism textbook. Users are seeking ways to reproduce this notation in LaTeX or standard symbol fonts. One participant found a site suggesting that the squiggly r is a special font created for Griffiths' book but could not verify this. Instead, they utilized the fcursive font package as a workaround. The discussion highlights the challenge of typesetting this specific notation effectively.
radiogaga35
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
Hi there

Griffiths uses a nice notation for the vector from the source point to the field point --a "squiggly r" -- in his E-M textbook. He calls it a "script letter". It makes many ugly expressions look much simpler.

Anyway, nice as it is, does anyone who has used Griffiths know how to produce that "squiggly r", in LaTeX or using some standard symbol font? I'm trying to typeset some stuff and I've been stumped trying to find it!

Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I remember looking for this about a year ago. After searching extensively, I came across a site claiming that this was a special font developed for the purpose of the book. Whether or not I believe it, after a couple days of searching, I hadn't found anything, so I ended up using the fcursive font package. Take a look and see if you can be satisfied with as little as I was =)

Good luck,
a.
 
Ok, thanks for the suggestion, I'll take a look!
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top