Gross Pitaevskii one dimensional solution

  • Thread starter Thread starter Yoris21
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    One dimensional
Yoris21
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Moved from a technical forum, so homework template missing
Hey guys, new to the forum here! I'm having this excercise where I have to prove that the solution of Gross Pitaevskii in one dimension, is equal to: φ(x)=Ctanh(x/L) for a>0 and φ(x)=C'tanh(x/L). The differential equation goes like this:

screenshot-eclass.upatras.gr-2020.09.16-01_32_58.png

Any thoughts on what approximations do I have to use?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's very annoying when people post homework problems and show no attempt at the solution. It shows that you are either lazy or your course work is beyond your abilities and it's an insult to others who show effort. It's against the PF rules for me to help you if you show no effort but I will give you some hints because I don't have the patience to hold your hand through this problem. Hopefully, in your next post you will show some effort.

First, the Gross-Pitaevskii equation has no closed form solution when ##V(\vec r) \ne 0##.

Second, with ##V(\vec r) = 0## you have a second order, homogeneous, non-linear differential equation (very hard to solve). Why don't you use ##\phi (x) = C \tanh (\frac{x}{L})## as a trial solution?

Third, you need boundary conditions. Remember that you are dealing with a soliton. I suggest,
$$
\lim_{x \rightarrow +\infty} \phi (x)=0
$$
$$
\lim_{x \rightarrow +\infty} \frac{d\phi (x)}{dx}=0
$$
With these boundary you can evaluate ##C## and ##L##. I'll leave it to you to justify the use of these boundary conditions.
 
Hi, thanks for your response. As I said in my first sentence, I am new to the forum here, so I am not yet quite familiar with the forum rules. I accept that this excercise may be beyond my abilities, however, you should also be more polite to people that you don't know, either you have the upper hand on them, or not. You have no idea what effort anyone makes for their work, therefore you should not conclude in such allegations.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top