Ground State Energy of Diatomic Molecule

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the ground state energy of a diatomic molecule, defined by the Hamiltonian H = l²/2I + F*d*cos theta, where the dipole moment term is considered small. The ground state energy is expressed as E_0 = \hbar*l*(l+1)/2I, and the participant seeks to confirm its correctness and how to apply first-order perturbation theory to assess energy changes due to field interaction. The first-order energy shift is calculated using the expression E_1 = <psi_0|V|psi_0>, where V represents the perturbing term. Additionally, the conversation clarifies that the ground state is defined as the state with minimum energy, making the notion of an excited state being the ground state nonsensical. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding perturbation theory in quantum mechanics.
greisen
Messages
75
Reaction score
0
I am looking at a diatomic molecule where the Hamiltonian is given as

H = l²/2I + F*d*cos theta

where d is the dipole moment. The term F*d*cos theta is small. I write the energy of ground state as

E_0 = \hbar*l*(l+1)/ 2I

Than I have to determine how much the ground-state energy changes as a result of interaction with the field. I have two questions:

1. Is the ground state energy correct - it should not be <psi_0|H|psi_0)?

2. How to proceed using first-order perturbation theory


Thanks in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1. Write down the eigenfunctions of the unperturbed hamiltonian, H _0 = L^2/2I (recall from the hydrogen atom), and it's eigenvalues (already written above).

2. From the eigenfunctions, \phi _n ^{(0)} and the eigenvalues, E_n^{(0)}, what expression gives you the first order energy shift due to the perturbing hamiltonian, H _1?
 
so the change will be given as
E_1 = <psi_0|V|psi_0>
where V is the small term?
 
That's right, that's the first order correction to the ground state energy.
 
Thanks could there be a situation where an electronic excited state could be "ground state" for a molecule - having lower energy than a none excited state?
 
The ground state is the state with minimum energy. If the energy is quantized (which happens only in bound states), then states with higher energy are called "excited states". So your question is meaningless...
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top