Grounding Test: Ordinary Multimeter vs Special Tool?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on whether a point-to-point test for grounding resistance can be effectively conducted with an ordinary multimeter or if a specialized ground test tool is necessary. It highlights that while the NETA standard of 0.5 ohm is widely accepted, ordinary multimeters can introduce significant lead resistance that interferes with accurate measurements. A four-wire "Kelvin" resistance meter is recommended for this purpose, as it uses separate leads for current supply and voltage measurement, minimizing the impact of lead resistance. The specialized tool ensures compliance with safety standards and provides more reliable readings. Accurate grounding tests are crucial for electrical safety and system integrity.
Royherd27
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Can the point to point test, (to determine the resistance between the main grounding system and all the major electrical frames, system neutral, etc) be made with an ordinary multimeter or does it need a special ground test tool?
The NETA value of 0.5 ohm is widely accepted?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
The advantage of an approved tester is that it is consistent with your country's requirements, and doesn't depend on you interpreting the rules and the readings and correctly applying the correct stimulus.
 
Royherd27 said:
Can the point to point test, (to determine the resistance between the main grounding system and all the major electrical frames, system neutral, etc) be made with an ordinary multimeter or does it need a special ground test tool?
The NETA value of 0.5 ohm is widely accepted?

The basic problem with ordinary multimeter is that its leads will add resistance in series. You will need long leads if you are probing between major electrical frames, the lead resistance will probably be orders of magnitude more than the bonding resistance you are trying to measure.

You need a 4 wire "Kelvin" resistance meter (previous posters provided links). Here is how they work:

2 leads supply a constant controlled current source through the ground structure under test (lead resistance not an issue here since it is a current source). The other two leads measure voltage across the current source. The voltage measurement leads draw very low leakage current so lead resistance here is not an issue.
 
Hi all I have some confusion about piezoelectrical sensors combination. If i have three acoustic piezoelectrical sensors (with same receive sensitivity in dB ref V/1uPa) placed at specific distance, these sensors receive acoustic signal from a sound source placed at far field distance (Plane Wave) and from broadside. I receive output of these sensors through individual preamplifiers, add them through hardware like summer circuit adder or in software after digitization and in this way got an...
I have recently moved into a new (rather ancient) house and had a few trips of my Residual Current breaker. I dug out my old Socket tester which tell me the three pins are correct. But then the Red warning light tells me my socket(s) fail the loop test. I never had this before but my last house had an overhead supply with no Earth from the company. The tester said "get this checked" and the man said the (high but not ridiculous) earth resistance was acceptable. I stuck a new copper earth...
I am not an electrical engineering student, but a lowly apprentice electrician. I learn both on the job and also take classes for my apprenticeship. I recently wired my first transformer and I understand that the neutral and ground are bonded together in the transformer or in the service. What I don't understand is, if the neutral is a current carrying conductor, which is then bonded to the ground conductor, why does current only flow back to its source and not on the ground path...
Back
Top