sophiecentaur
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
- 30,269
- 7,441
@Jim
That's a fair enough view but it doesn't really constitute Physics imho. You don't need Physics to fix your car electrics, usually, but there are a number of problems I have solved which have benefited a lot from something more than the 'complete circuit' idea.
This is supposed to be a Physics Forum - not a car fixit helpline. I think it only reasonable that people who present problems, based on Physics, should expect answers which are at least a bit demanding.
Is it showing off to tell people that they need to do more than first year Science and they will need some reasonable Maths if they are going to get a better understanding? Is it showing off to tell people that they will not be able to run a Marathon without some serious training? Or that they will need to learn to swim before they jump into the deep end of the pool?
Inverted snobbery never got anyone anywhere.
I agree that the New Math approach didn't work - but that isn't really a parallel. The 'why' is essential when you want to do more than arithmetic. There are very few valid arm waving 'explanations' to help someone perform a Fourier Transform or Correlation.
That's a fair enough view but it doesn't really constitute Physics imho. You don't need Physics to fix your car electrics, usually, but there are a number of problems I have solved which have benefited a lot from something more than the 'complete circuit' idea.
This is supposed to be a Physics Forum - not a car fixit helpline. I think it only reasonable that people who present problems, based on Physics, should expect answers which are at least a bit demanding.
Is it showing off to tell people that they need to do more than first year Science and they will need some reasonable Maths if they are going to get a better understanding? Is it showing off to tell people that they will not be able to run a Marathon without some serious training? Or that they will need to learn to swim before they jump into the deep end of the pool?
Inverted snobbery never got anyone anywhere.
I agree that the New Math approach didn't work - but that isn't really a parallel. The 'why' is essential when you want to do more than arithmetic. There are very few valid arm waving 'explanations' to help someone perform a Fourier Transform or Correlation.