Group representations, interesting aspects?

ArcanaNoir
Messages
778
Reaction score
4
I am writing an undergraduate "thesis" on group representations (no original work, basically a glorified research paper). I was wondering if anyone could suggest interesting aspects that might be worth writing about in my paper.

I have only just begun to explore the topic, and I see that it is quite broad. I'm thinking I like finite groups, and maybe restricting the field over which I explore the matrices would be interesting. (besides, I'm not a fan of complex numbers..) I definitely plan to look into reductions and minimal representations. Sorry if my terminology is wrong, I'm really just beginning with this.

I'm really excited about this research, I love algebra!

Oh, and any books that you think might be helpful would be appreciated, especially books that are not very advanced. I haven't taken analysis or topology yet, and I'm finding a lot of material kind of inaccessible.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Good books would include "Algebra" from Artin and "Algebra" from Lang. They contain nice section on representation theory.
 
thanks micro
 
I find this blog interesting because he has a way of expressing the mathematical essence of ideas. (Although I also find the Wordpress blogs awkward to navigate. Google finds things in them better than the Wordpress interface.) http://drexel28.wordpress.com/2011/01/18/representation-theory-definitions-and-basics/

To me, the most interesting aspect of the representation of continuous groups is that the matrix entries (which are functions of the parameters that define the group) often turn out to be the important "special functions" of mathematical physics. This is only unified way that I know about for looking at the special functions.
 
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
Back
Top