Group Velocity Derivation: Understanding the Role of Ignored Terms

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the derivation of group velocity and the reasoning behind ignoring certain terms in the calculation. It highlights a common confusion regarding the significance of terms before the integral sign and their potential impact on phase shifts. The consensus is that group velocity focuses on the speed of amplitude rather than phase, which justifies the omission of specific terms. Participants emphasize that while these terms may affect phase, they do not influence the overall group velocity calculation. Ultimately, understanding this distinction is crucial for accurately interpreting wave behavior.
chingel
Messages
307
Reaction score
23
I was reading the derivation on Wikipedia:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Group_velocity#Derivation

Why is the first part before the integral sign ignored when calculating the velocity? Surely it would also cause a phase shift in some time interval and make the waves move forward (or backward)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Group velocity cares about the speed of the amplitude, phases are not relevant for the group velocity.
 
Ok, but when calculating the velocity by dividing the terms in front of t by those in front of k, why can some of the terms in front of t be ignored?
 

Thread '1:1 versus 2:1 Mechanical Advantage debate'

The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
View full post »

Thread 'Average velocity as a weighted mean'

Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
View full post »

Thread 'Newton's first law?'

Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
View full post »

Similar threads

Group velocity and phase velocity
Replies
4
Views
1K
Can anybody help with group velocity simulations?
Replies
18
Views
5K
I Does a rotating accelerometer moving linearly measure linear velocity?
Replies
47
Views
4K
Group velocity of a wavepacket vs its mean phase velocity
Replies
3
Views
1K
Understanding the Concept of Phase Velocity: Explained Simply
Replies
4
Views
2K
What is phase velocity and how does it relate to group velocity?
Replies
6
Views
4K
What's the truth about phase velocity vs. group velocity?
Replies
3
Views
7K
Is Group Velocity Dispersion Infinite for Light in Air?
Replies
1
Views
6K
Group Velocity of Non-Dispersive Wave Packet
Replies
3
Views
2K
Some doubts on signal velocity
Replies
5
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top