Groups - Internal Direct Product

Ted123
Messages
428
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



[PLAIN]http://img689.imageshack.us/img689/3047/directproduct.png

< denotes a subgroup.
\triangleleft denotes a normal subgroup.

The Attempt at a Solution



Have I done (a) correctly?

0 \in A so A \neq \emptyset

If a=x+ix and b=y+iy

then ab^{-1} = x-y + ix - iy = x-y + i(x-y) \in A

\therefore A < G

Again 0 \in B so B \neq \emptyset

If c=x+ix and d=y+iy

then cd^{-1} = x-y - ix - iy = x-y - i(x+y) \in B

\therefore B < G

If g=x+iy \in G and a=c+ic \in A

then gag^{-1} = x+iy + c+ic -x-iy = c+ic \in A

\therefore A \triangleleft G

If b=c-ic \in B

then gbg^{-1} = x+iy + c-ic -x-iy = c-ic \in B

\therefore B \triangleleft G

It is clear that A \cap B = \{0\} .

If a=c+ic \in A and b=d-id \in B

than ab = c+ic +d-id = c+d + i(c-d)

so if g=x+iy \in G then g=ab with x=c+d \in \mathbb{R} and y=c-d \in \mathbb{R}

\therefore G=AB and G is the internal direct product of A and B.

Can anyone help with (b)?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
For part (a), you don't need to do a calculation to prove that A and B are normal in G; you could simply observe that G is abelian so all its subgroups are normal.

Also, your proof that AB = G has the right idea but is phrased wrong. You need to put it in the form: given g = x + iy \in G, I exhibit the following a = c + ic \in A and b = d - id \in B so that g = ab, namely: (insert computation of c, d in terms of x, y here). The way you phrased it above, it proves that AB \subset G, which is obvious; you need to prove that AB is all of G.

For part (b), think about how you can modify the determinant of a matrix in G using a matrix in B.
 
ystael said:
For part (a), you don't need to do a calculation to prove that A and B are normal in G; you could simply observe that G is abelian so all its subgroups are normal.

Also, your proof that AB = G has the right idea but is phrased wrong. You need to put it in the form: given g = x + iy \in G, I exhibit the following a = c + ic \in A and b = d - id \in B so that g = ab, namely: (insert computation of c, d in terms of x, y here). The way you phrased it above, it proves that AB \subset G, which is obvious; you need to prove that AB is all of G.

For part (b), think about how you can modify the determinant of a matrix in G using a matrix in B.

So c=\frac{x+y}{2} and \frac{x-y}{2} then g=ab .

For part (b) to prove that A<G, I can say that:

A (2n+1) \times (2n+1) matrix is invertible if and only if it has non-zero determinant so A \subset G.

Furthermore, A is non-empty since I_{2n+1} \in A since \text{det}(I_{2n+1})=1.

To prove that CD^{-1} \in A for all C,D \in A is this correct?:

Let C,D \in A. Then det(C)=det(D)=1. Now by the properties of determinants,

\text{det}(CD^{-1}) = \text{det}(C)\text{det}(D^{-1}) = \frac{\text{det}(C)}{\text{det}(D)} = \frac{1}{1} = 1 .

So CD^{-1} \in A and A<G.

Now suppose P \in G and Q \in A

Then \text{det}(PQP^{-1}) = \text{det}(P)\text{det}(Q)\text{det}(P^{-1}) = \text{det}(P)\text{det}(Q)\text{det}(P)^{-1} = \text{det}(Q) = 1 .

Therefore A \triangleleft G .

Now B \neq \emptyset since I\in B (set u=1) .

If U = \begin{bmatrix}u &amp; 0 &amp; \ldots &amp; 0 \\ 0 &amp; u &amp; \ldots &amp; 0 \\ \vdots &amp; \vdots &amp; \ddots &amp; \vdots\\0 &amp; 0 &amp;\ldots &amp; u\end{bmatrix} \in B and If V = \begin{bmatrix}v &amp; 0 &amp; \ldots &amp; 0 \\ 0 &amp; v &amp; \ldots &amp; 0 \\ \vdots &amp; \vdots &amp; \ddots &amp; \vdots\\0 &amp; 0 &amp;\ldots &amp; v\end{bmatrix} \in B

Then UV^{-1} = \begin{bmatrix}uv^{-1} &amp; 0 &amp; \ldots &amp; 0 \\ 0 &amp; uv^{-1} &amp; \ldots &amp; 0 \\ \vdots &amp; \vdots &amp; \ddots &amp; \vdots\\0 &amp; 0 &amp;\ldots &amp; uv^{-1}\end{bmatrix} \in B

so that B &lt; G .

If P\in G is a (2n+1) \times (2n+1) matrix of the same size of U with arbitrary entries then UP=PU and it follows that PUP^{-1} = U . Hence B \triangleleft G .

Now since \text{det}(U) = u^{2n+1} and u\neq 0 it follows that if U \in A then u=1 .

Therefore A \cap B = \{1\}= .

Let \text{det}(P) = r \neq 0

Then P = [The matrix P with every element divided by \sqrt{r} ] \begin{bmatrix}\sqrt{r} & 0 & \ldots & 0 \\ 0 & \sqrt{r} & \ldots & 0 \\ \vdots & \vdots & \ddots & \vdots\\0 & 0 &\ldots & \sqrt{r} \end{bmatrix} = QU[/itex]

We have Q \in A for \text{det}(Q)= \frac{\text{det}(P)}{r} = 1 and U \in B.

Therefore G=AB and G is the internal direct product of A and B.
 
Last edited:
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top