Gyroscopic Precession (Relationship with ωspin and ωprecession)

  • Thread starter Thread starter ILoveZerg
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Precession
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding the relationship between the rate of precession (ωprecession) and the angular velocity of a spinning wheel (ωspin). The key equation presented is ωprecession = τ/Iωspin, where τ represents torque and I is the moment of inertia. The user seeks clarification on the meaning of these equations and whether the relationship can be simplified to ωprecession = Mgr/(Mr2^2ω). Further analysis suggests that the equation is indeed correct, with r2 representing the radius of the wheel and r the radius of the horizontal rod. The conversation emphasizes the need for a deeper understanding of the underlying physics concepts.
ILoveZerg
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I am trying to find the relationship between the rate of precession(ωprecession) and the angular velocity of the wheel(ωspin). Here is a video that explains the problem well:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ty9QSiVC2g0

Homework Equations



$$L = r X P = Iω$$
$$\tau = r X F$$

The Attempt at a Solution



http://demoweb.physics.ucla.edu/node/29
http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/physics/GyroscopicPrecession.html

So, above are the answers to my question. However, they do not do a very good job of explaining what the equations mean. The equation for ωprecession from the first link is:
ω_{precession} = \stackrel{\tau}{I\omega_{spin}}
ω_{precession} = \stackrel{Mgr}{L}

I am trying to understand these and really do not know where to go from here. Is it really as simple as ω_{precession} = \stackrel{Mgr}{Mr_{2}^2\omega}?

Edit: I was doing some more thinking and in the above equation where I replaced Iw with Mr^2w. The r2 on the bottom is the radius of the wheel while r is the radius of the horizontal "rod".
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
ILoveZerg said:
Is it really as simple as ω_{precession} = \frac{Mgr}{Mr_{2}^2\omega}?

Edit: I was doing some more thinking and in the above equation where I replaced Iw with Mr^2w. The r2 on the bottom is the radius of the wheel while r is the radius of the horizontal "rod".

Yes, that looks right (after changing \stackrel to \frac).
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top