Hamilton-Jacobi equation in spherical coordinates

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the Hamilton-Jacobi equation in spherical coordinates, highlighting confusion over the correct form of the Hamiltonian. The user suggests that the Hamiltonian should be expressed as H = (1/2m)(p_r^2 + p_θ^2 + p_φ^2) + U(r, θ, φ). They clarify the kinetic energy in spherical coordinates and provide definitions for the momenta p_r, p_θ, and p_φ. Ultimately, the user acknowledges a mistake in their earlier derivation, specifically missing a square in their calculations. This highlights the importance of careful derivation in theoretical physics.
DrClaude
Mentor
Messages
8,477
Reaction score
5,693
I was looking at the Wikipedia entry on the Hamilton-Jacobi equation, and was confounded by the equation at the beginning of the section on spherical coordinates:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hamilton–Jacobi_equation#Spherical_coordinates

Shouldn't the Hamiltonian simply be
$$
H = \frac{1}{2m} \left[ p_r^2 + p_\theta^2 + p_\phi^2 \right] + U(r, \theta, \phi)
$$
?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In spherical coordinates, kinetic energy is $$ T = {m \over 2} \left( v_{r}^2 + v_{\theta}^2 + v_{\phi}^2 \right) = {m \over 2} \left( \dot r ^2 + (r \dot \theta)^2 + (r \sin \theta \ \dot \phi)^2 \right) $$ By definition, $$ p_r = {\partial T \over \partial r} = m \dot r \\ p_{\theta} = {\partial T \over \partial \theta } = m r^2 \dot \theta \\ p_{\phi} = {\partial T \over \partial \phi} = m r^2 \sin^2 \theta \ \dot \phi $$
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Thanks a lot! I now realize I missed a square in my derivation :redface:
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Back
Top