Hamilton's Equations of Motion

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between generalized forces and Hamilton's equations of motion. It asserts that when the generalized force F is not zero, the equation dH/dq = -pdot remains valid, as generalized forces are inherently included in the Lagrangian formulation. The Lagrangian, defined as L = T - V, incorporates the effects of forces through its derivatives, eliminating the need to explicitly include F in Hamilton's equations. The derivation shows that dL/dq leads to the momentum p, confirming that pdot = -dH/dq is consistently true. Overall, the analysis emphasizes that the force is fundamentally embedded within the Lagrangian framework.
jhat21
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Here's a quick one:

If the generalized force F is not zero,
does the equation
dH/dq = -pdot

become
dH/dq = F- pdot
?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What have generalized forces have to do with the hamiltonian formulation of dynamics ??
 
dextercioby said:
What have generalized forces have to do with the hamiltonian formulation of dynamics ??
Everything. Hamiltonian dynamics concerns itself with positions and generalized momenta. A generalized force is the derivative of a generalized momentum.
 
Hamilton's equations are always:

\dot{p} = -\frac{\partial H}{\partial q} = f
\dot{q} & = & \frac{\partial H}{\partial p} = v
 
Last edited:
Oh because dL/dq always equals d/dt[ dL/dqdot ]!
no matter what the force is, the force is inclusive in dL/dq
since
L = T - V
and
dL/dq = dT/dq - dV/dq ,
where the force, F = -dV/dq
taking the partial derivative of L w/respect to position q takes care of our generalized force F, so we don't need to write it explicitly in the Hamiltonian equations. it's already covered by the Lagrangian in dL/dq, which we can express as the time derivative of the momentum, pdot.

the idea is that the force is in the Lagrangian!

Then when u derive the Hamiltonian equations from Lagrange's
u have dH/dq = - dL/dq
and using the above observation about dL/dq, we have
dL/dq = d/dt[ dL/dqdot ]

going to inside the brackets we have
dL/dqdot = d/dqdot [ 1/2 m qdot^2] = m qdot = p
which is always - always true.
and that means its time derivative is
d/dt[ dL/dqdot = p ] = pdot

so the conclusion is the same
the equation is always

pdot = - dH/dq

oh my god
dT/dq = 0
it's so obvious
then
dL/dq = F
lol
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top