Hands of a Clock Constant Velocity?

AI Thread Summary
The hands of a clock do not have a constant velocity because, despite moving at a uniform speed, they are constantly changing direction as they rotate. This change in direction means that the hands are accelerating, making option d) the correct answer. The discussion clarifies that constant speed does not equate to constant velocity when direction is involved. Therefore, the notion that the hands could have a constant velocity is incorrect. In summary, uniform circular motion exemplifies a scenario where velocity is not constant due to continuous directional change.
WriterTyper
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi Folks,

What I have here is a multiple choice question from a practice test. I believe there to be two right answers but the answer key says there's only 1. I'm not looking for anyone to do my homework for me, I just think there is a mistake. Here we go:

The hands of a clock _______.

a) have a constant velocity c) constantly change speed
b) have no momentum d) are accelerating

Now I know for sure that d is correct because there is a diagram of this very question in the book! Any object when has a change in it's motion is accelerating, regardless of speed.

BUT...aren't the hands of a clock going in a constant speed and direction? So wouldn't they have a constantly velocity? Meaning that "a" is right as well? I thought that moving in a circular path was considered to be constant direction and hence, with constant speed, to mean constant velocity.

If I'm wrong please explain why...this has been bothering me for a few hours.

Thanks!
WT
 
Physics news on Phys.org
WriterTyper said:
Now I know for sure that d is correct because there is a diagram of this very question in the book! Any object when has a change in it's motion is accelerating, regardless of speed.
Acceleration is a measure of the rate of change of velocity. Whenever the velocity changes, there's an acceleration.
BUT...aren't the hands of a clock going in a constant speed and direction?
Are they? What direction does the hand move when pointing at 12 versus when pointing at 6?
So wouldn't they have a constantly velocity? Meaning that "a" is right as well? I thought that moving in a circular path was considered to be constant direction and hence, with constant speed, to mean constant velocity.
While the speed doesn't change for uniform circular motion, the direction is constantly changing. Imagine someone running around a circular track at constant speed. Are they always going in the same direction?
 
Ah ha, thanks Doc Al. So the hands are constantly changing direction, and hence constantly changing velocity. And since the velocity is constantly changing, the hands are accelerating. D is the only answer: there is no mistake.

So can we say that a perfect circular movement is, in a way, the complete opposite of constant velocity?

Thanks again,
WT
 
Last edited:
WriterTyper said:
So can we say that a perfect circular movement is, in a way, the complete opposite of constant velocity?
I'm not sure what 'complete opposite' would mean, but it's definitely not constant velocity. Velocity can change in two ways: the speed can change or the direction can change (or both). Uniform circular motion is an example of just direction changing.
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top