Hard disk radial distribution function

Jeno
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Hi, i am running a hard disks molecular dynamics simulation. I would like to compare the radial distribution function obtained from my simulation with the theoretical radial distribution function. May i know what is the theoretical radial distribution function? Or what data do people normally compare with when they do molecular dynamic simulation?

Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In statistical physics, there is not "the theory", but a variety of theory approaches. From my experience, theory for hard-core interactions is unreliable. I'm working on a model with hard-core interaction for which a whole zoo of theory approaches and results exist - and most of them are wrong. I don't know how accurate correlation functions from theory predictions are. But I would not compare radial distribution functions to theory results unless I have reason to believe this particular result to be correct (of course you can be pragmatic, compare, and call the theory result correct if it fits your data :biggrin:). One option is to compare to experiment. Assuming you want to test your code: just compare to a different computer simulation (worst case I could dig out my old Monte Carlo code, but you probably want to compare against published data, anyways). Also note that searching Google Scholar for "hard disk fluid radial distribution function" gives about 24000 hits; it's not exactly an exotic model or observable that you are looking at.
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...

Similar threads

Back
Top