Hard? least common multiple problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter Hello Kitty
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hard Multiple
Hello Kitty
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
I'm trying to prove or disprove the following:

Let a_1, ..., a_n be natural numbers such that the least common multiple of EVERY n-1 of them is equal to lcm(a_1, ..., a_n) = m. Is it true that a_i = m for some i?

The method I've tried so far is to build systems of equations using the information known to prove it in the positive, but it gets very messy. I've also had no luck finding a counter example.

n=2 is easy (it's true), but the method doesn't generalize.

Thanks in advance.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Try it for a few more n's and do you see a pattern?
 
Consider n=3: (a,b,c), and let's try to find a counterexample. Let d=gcd(a,b), e=gcd(b,c), f=gcd(a,c). Clearly we must have d,e,f>1 or one would be the lcm of the other two. Let's assume that (d,e,f)=1 for simplicity. The simplest way to construct a triple would be (df,de,ef). Then:
lcm(df,de)=lcm(de,ef)=lcm(df,ef)=lcm(df,ef,de)=def=m > a,b,c. Or a more concrete example: (6,10,15) then the lcm = 30.
 
Many thanks. Yes, silly of me not to spot this sooner. Actually I'm trying to solve a more general problem and this would have been a sufficient condition if it were true. My post in the algebra section has the details.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top