Hard? least common multiple problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter Hello Kitty
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hard Multiple
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the problem of determining whether, given natural numbers a_1, ..., a_n where the least common multiple (LCM) of every n-1 of them equals the overall LCM, it can be concluded that one of the numbers equals the overall LCM. The user has explored this for n=2, confirming the statement is true, but struggles to generalize it for larger n. They attempt to find counterexamples for n=3, suggesting a construction method using greatest common divisors (GCD) that leads to a scenario where the LCM exceeds the individual numbers. A specific example provided is (6, 10, 15), where the LCM is 30, illustrating the complexity of the problem. The user acknowledges that their exploration is part of a broader inquiry into the topic.
Hello Kitty
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
I'm trying to prove or disprove the following:

Let a_1, ..., a_n be natural numbers such that the least common multiple of EVERY n-1 of them is equal to lcm(a_1, ..., a_n) = m. Is it true that a_i = m for some i?

The method I've tried so far is to build systems of equations using the information known to prove it in the positive, but it gets very messy. I've also had no luck finding a counter example.

n=2 is easy (it's true), but the method doesn't generalize.

Thanks in advance.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Try it for a few more n's and do you see a pattern?
 
Consider n=3: (a,b,c), and let's try to find a counterexample. Let d=gcd(a,b), e=gcd(b,c), f=gcd(a,c). Clearly we must have d,e,f>1 or one would be the lcm of the other two. Let's assume that (d,e,f)=1 for simplicity. The simplest way to construct a triple would be (df,de,ef). Then:
lcm(df,de)=lcm(de,ef)=lcm(df,ef)=lcm(df,ef,de)=def=m > a,b,c. Or a more concrete example: (6,10,15) then the lcm = 30.
 
Many thanks. Yes, silly of me not to spot this sooner. Actually I'm trying to solve a more general problem and this would have been a sufficient condition if it were true. My post in the algebra section has the details.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Back
Top