Harmonic Motion - Bungee Jumping

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the physics of bungee jumping, specifically analyzing the harmonic motion of a bungee cord acting as a spring. The jumper's weight causes the bungee to stretch a distance L, with the jump point situated 6L above the ground and the bungee's relaxed length at 3L. To determine if the jump is safe, the amplitude of oscillation must be calculated to ensure the lowest point of the jump does not fall below 6L. The approach involves using energy conservation principles to assess the potential energy of the jumper and the energy stored in the stretched bungee. Ultimately, a thorough understanding of the spring constant and energy dynamics is crucial for evaluating the safety of the test jump.
youngling
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


You (mass m) are chosen as the "test pilot" for a new bungee jump. When
you suspend yourself at rest from the bungee, you find that it stretches a
distance L under your body weight. The jump point is a height 6L above the
ground and the relaxed (unstretched length) of the bungee is 3L. Should you
make the test jump?

Variables: k - spring constant
L - distance from jump point
I think that's it...

Given: m - your mass
equilibrium length of bungee+mass: 3L + L = 4L

Homework Equations



F = -kx
F = mg
x = A cos(wt + phase)

The Attempt at a Solution


I have no idea but I know that we're dealing with a harmonic motion problem where the bungee cord acts as a spring, and I think we need to determine the amplitude so that we can see if the "lowest" endpoint of the oscillation is greater than 6L from the jump point... because if it isn't then SPLAT. However, I don't know where to start. I said that F = -kx - mg, and then set F = 0 and x = 4L for the equilibrium point and got that k = -mg/4L
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You should rather think in energy terms - energy is stored in the cord when it is stretched. Check what extension is required to absorb all of the potential energy of the test pilot.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top