Harmonic Oscillator wave function

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
12 replies · 7K views
diegoarmando
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
Uncertainty - Harmonic Oscillator

The Wave function for the ground state of a quantum harmonic oscillator is
[tex] \psi=(\alpha/\pi)^{1/4}e^{-\alpha x^2/2}[/tex] where [tex]\alpha = \sqrt{ mk/ \hbar^2}[/tex].

Compute [tex]\Delta x \Delta p[/tex]known:
Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle:
[tex]\Delta p \Delta x >= \hbar/2[/tex]

In order to compute [tex]\Delta x \Delta p[/tex], what do I need to do? any integral?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Well done - but I think that is already known to science.
Or did you have a further question about it?
 
My question is how to find [tex]\Delta x \Delta p[/tex]
 
You'll want to find the expectation values of x^2 and p^2 (since the expectation values of x and p are zero), and take their square roots. These are your deltas. So yes, you have to integrate to find <psi|x^2|psi> and <psi|p^2|psi>.
 
Just to be pedantic, [tex]\Delta x^2 = \langle x^2 \rangle - \langle x \rangle^2[/tex]. Just that in this case, [tex]\langle x \rangle = 0[/tex].
 
Thanks guys,
but how the <x> and <p> are zero, could you please help me for integral part, what is the limits of integral in this case?
 
The limits on the integral are +/- infinity. And both integrals have the general form of an integral of x*exp(-K*x^2). So the integrand is an odd function. It's integral is zero.
 
ok, I find [tex]<x^2> =1/2\alpha[/tex] what should I do for <p^2>
p=-i*hbar ?
 
Uh, p=-i*hbar*d/dx. You need to apply that operator twice to psi since you are finding <psi|p^2|psi>. Your <x^2> looks good.
 
Last edited:
I found [tex]\Delta x \Delta p=\hbar/\sqrt {2}[/tex]
which means [tex]\Delta x \Delta p[/tex] is independent from the value of alpha, what do you think? somehow I think I should have gotten [tex]\Delta x \Delta p=\hbar/2[/tex]
 
You did really well, except yes, you should have gotten hbar/2. I did. Can you find the missing sqrt(2)? I can check intermediate results if you want to post them.
 
Thanks for the reply, I think I found the missing sqrt(2)
 
diegoarmando said:
Thanks for the reply, I think I found the missing sqrt(2)

Well done.