Harmonic oscillator's energy levels

In summary: I don't remember the mathematical formula, but we must find the coefficients of the function at specific points in space (x,t), and then use those coefficients to calculate the integrals over the entire space. This is definitely something you could try on your own.
  • #1
Rorshach
136
0

Homework Statement


Okay, this one confuses me a bit:

A particle is in a one-dimensional harmonic oscillator. At time t = 0 is given by its wave function

ψ(x)=Nx3exp(-mωx2/2hbarred)

a) At this point you measure the particle's energy. What measurement values ​​are available? Also determine the corresponding probabilities!
b) After the power supply that gave outcome E = 3hbarredω/2 measure the particle's position immediately. What is the probability of finding the particle in the classically forbidden region? (The classically forbidden region is defined by the condition that V (x)> = E_total)


Homework Equations



En=(n+1/2)hbarredω

The Attempt at a Solution


I don't really have an idea how to come up with energy levels that are available, or how to calculate the probabilities of those levels.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
"one-dimensional harmonic oscillator" should imply the form of the Hamiltonian. You can almost guess what it should look like. If it is not in your notes, then you could google it if you are having trouble.
 
  • #3
I got notice on violation of rules of the forum by posting a problem that I did not try to solve on my own- while it is not entirely true, I understand it could be perceived as such. I am sincerely sorry, won't happen again. I tried to come with idea how to find out how many possible energy levels are available for my function, but only thing that comes to my mind is this basic formula for energy E=(n+1/2)hbarredω. Hamiltonian for my function is of course
h=-hbarred2/2m(d/dx)+1/2mω2x2 , but how to connect it to my search for available energy levels?
 
  • #4
I don't really understand why would the Hamiltonian help to solve for a).
At first glance the psi function they give you is a supperposition of only 2 eigenstates (can you find them?) that have a definite energy. I guess that these energies are the one you could possibly measure.

As for the energy level formula ##E_n =\hbar \omega (n+1/2)##, it comes from solving the Schrödinger's equation and assuming that the solution behaves as ##f(x)v(x)## where v(x) is a decaying exponential that solves the Schrödinger's equation when x tends to infinity and the function f(x) are the Hermite polynomials that you can determine when solving the original Schrödinger's equation using a power series "guess function" for f(x). You get that the solution doesn't diverge if and only if the power series is truncated for some n. This condition gives precisely that ##E_n =\hbar \omega (n+1/2)##.
 
  • #5
I don't know how to find those two eigenstates, how can You tell from first glance that there will be two levels?
 
  • #6
Rorshach said:
I don't know how to find those two eigenstates, how can You tell from first glance that there will be two levels?

Hint: Look at the first few Hermite polynomials and at the psi(x) they give you.
 
  • #7
So it is connected to power to which x is taken right? if x was to the power of 10 there would be 6 levels?
 
  • #8
Rorshach said:
So it is connected to power to which x is taken right? if x was to the power of 10 there would be 6 levels?

If you only had x to the power of 10, I think so. But if you had an x^10 as well as say an x^9 in your psi(x), then no, not only necessarily 6 levels.
The idea is that the ##\psi _n (x)## form a basis for any function ##\Psi (x,t)## for a fixed t. In your case t is fixed at ##t=0##.
So that you can write your ##\Psi (x,0)## as a linear combination of the ##\psi _n(x)##. One writes ##\Psi (x,0)=\Psi(x)=\sum _{n=0}^\infty c_n \psi _n (x)##.
We're lucky enough that the from the ##\Psi (x)## they give you, it's not hard to determine the coefficients ##c_n## and the ##\psi _n (x)## involved.
I'll also tell you a "trick". The associated probabilities with each energy levels are simply the values of ##|c_n|^2##. But in your exercise, I think you're meant to find them by integration (I've never done it, so I'll have to do it myself too!). Though it's good to know 2 methods so you can compare the results afterwards.
 
  • #9
okay, but how do I determine the cn and the ψn(x)? It sounds similar to distributing the function into the Fourier series, but I have never had a clue how to perform Fourier series distribution on a function... if I am right and this is the thing to do, could you show me on example how to perform Fourier series distribution?
 
  • #10
Rorshach said:
okay, but how do I determine the cn and the ψn(x)? It sounds similar to distributing the function into the Fourier series, but I have never had a clue how to perform Fourier series distribution on a function... if I am right and this is the thing to do, could you show me on example how to perform Fourier series distribution?

I'm not sure it's a "Fourier expansion" but the idea is pretty similar. We must exploit the orthogonality property of the eigenstates; or the fact that they form a basis for any psi(x).
We have ##\Psi(x)=\sum _{n=0}^\infty c_n \psi _n (x)##. Multiply both sides by ##\psi ^* _m (x)## and integrate from - infinity to positive infinity. After a bit of algebra you'll reach that ##c_m = \int _{-\infty}^\infty \psi ^* _ m (x) \Psi (x) dx##.
 
  • #11
I'm sorry, but I still don't know how to get ψn. It seems to me that without it I cannot do anything.
 
  • #12
Rorshach said:
I'm sorry, but I still don't know how to get ψn. It seems to me that without it I cannot do anything.

You get them when you solve the -normalized- Schrödinger's equation (##\psi '' + (2\varepsilon - y^2)\psi =0## where ##y=x(m \omega / \hbar )^{1/2}## and ##\varepsilon = E/(\hbar \omega )##) and assume that the solutions you're looking for are of the form ##\psi (y)=v(y)\exp (-y^2/2)##. And in order to calculate v(y) you propose a power series of the form ##v(y)=\sum _{k=0}^\infty C_k y^k##.
In order for ##\psi (y)## to converge you'll get that the power series for v(y) must be truncated at some value for k=n.
You'll also get the recurrence relation ##C_{k+2}=C_k \frac{2k+1-2\varepsilon }{(k+2)(k+1)}##. So for any value of n, you get that v(y) is a Hermite polynomial.
And thus that the ##\psi (y)## turns out to be of the form ##\psi _n (y)= H_ n (y)e^{-y^2/2}##.
After replacing the variables back and normalizing, one reaches that ##\psi _n (x)=\left ( \frac{m\omega }{\pi \hbar 2^{2n}n!^2} \right ) ^{1/4} \exp \left ( - \frac{m\omega x^2}{2 \hbar} \right ) H_n \left [ \left ( \frac{m\omega }{\hbar} \right ) ^{1/2 }x \right ]##.

So yes, in your exercise I don't know how you could solve it without knowing the eigenfunctions ##\psi _n (x)##. Either you look at them in a book/Internet, either you find them yourself (which is a pain but maybe necessary).
 
  • #13
Ok, but how do I know into which polynomials I am supposed to distribute my wave function? I only know that the hermite polynomial of the third power of x is equal to 8x3-12x. Am I supposed to look for some coefficients that will convert that polynomial into my wave function?
 
  • #14
What are the first few eigenfunctions for the one-dimensional harmonic oscillator?
 
  • #15
Those are the functions that follow the formula [tex]ψ_n=C_nexp(\frac{-\xi^2}{2})H_n(\xi)[/tex], right?
 
  • #16
Right, assuming you have the correct expressions for the normalization constant and ##\xi##. I'm going to use ##\phi_n## to denote the eigenfunctions, so you don't confuse it with the given wavefunction ##\psi##.

You want to find the appropriate coefficients ##a_0, a_1, a_2, \dots## such that
$$\psi(x) = a_0 \phi_0(x) + a_1 \phi_1(x) + a_2 \phi_2(x) + a_3\phi_3(x) + \cdots$$ Substitute in for ##\psi##, ##\phi_0##, etc., and see if you can figure out how to solve for the coefficients. You should easily be able to see why ##a_n=0## for ##n\ge 4##.
 
  • #17
[itex]a_n=0[/itex], because the highest power in the formula is 3, right? I got to the point where I am supposed to match the coefficients, but I am somewhat confused by hermitian [itex]H_n(\xi)=\sum_{n=0}^\infty c_n\xi^n[/itex], namely: I know that hermitian with the power of [itex]\xi[/itex] being equal to 3 is [itex]H_3(\xi)=8\xi^3-12\xi[/itex] am I supposed to fix the constants for the elements of the hermitian sum so it would match the formula for the hermitian of third power [itex]exp(-\frac{1}{2}\xi^2)C_3(8\xi^3-12\xi)[/itex], or I am supposed to fix the constants so it would only leave [itex]\xi^3[/itex]?
 
Last edited:
  • #18
I don't understand what you're asking. Write it out explicitly in math.
 
  • #19
ok, so my wavefunction is [itex]\psi(x)=Nx^3exp(-\frac{m\omega x^2}{2\hbar})[/itex]. Now we substitute certain values: [itex]\omega=\sqrt{\frac{k}{m}}, \alpha=\sqrt{\frac{m\omega}{\hbar}}, \lambda=\frac{2E}{\hbar\omega}, \xi=x\alpha[/itex]. Then we can write the formula for the eigenfunctions: [itex]\psi(\xi)=C_nH(\xi)exp(-\frac{\xi^2}{2})[/itex]. We can write that [itex]H_n(\xi)\sum_{n=0}^\infty\ c_n\xi^n[/itex], right? Now I know that hermit polynomial [itex]H(\xi)[/itex]for [itex]\xi^3[/itex] is equal to [itex]8\xi^3-12\xi[/itex]. And now I don't know what coefficients I am supposed to be looking for: the ones that will give me just [itex]\xi^3[/itex], or the ones that will give me [itex]8\xi^3-12\xi[/itex].
 
Last edited:
  • #20
No. Reread post #16.
 
  • #21
So it is supposed to be something like [itex]\psi(x)=c_0H_0(\xi)exp(-\xi^2/2)+c_1H_1(\xi)exp(-\xi^2/2)+c_3H_3(\xi)exp(-\xi^2/2)[/itex]?
 
  • #22
Yes, but you don't want to neglect the normalization constants, ##C_n##.
$$\psi(\xi) = a_0 [C_0 H_0(\xi) e^{-\xi^2/2}] + a_1 [C_1 H_1(\xi) e^{-\xi^2/2}] + a_2 [C_2 H_2(\xi) e^{-\xi^2/2}] + a_3 [C_3 H_3(\xi) e^{-\xi^2/2}]$$ Write out the lefthand side explicitly as well.
 
  • #23
ok, but how do I know how to estimate [itex]a_n[/itex] coefficient, if powers of [itex]\xi[/itex] repeat? How do I know if it should be zero or some different value?
 
  • #24
I came up with coefficients [itex]a_1=\frac{3\sqrt{3}}{2}[/itex],[itex]a_3=\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}[/itex], other coefficients should be equal to zero. Is it correct?
 
  • #25
Show your work.
 
  • #26
[tex]\psi(\xi)=a_0[c_0 exp(-\frac{\xi^2}{2})]+a_1[c_1 2\xi exp(-\frac{\xi^2}{2})]+a_2[c_2 (4\xi^2-2)exp(-\frac{\xi^2}{2})]+a_3[c_3(8\xi^3-12\xi)exp(-\frac{\xi^2}{2})][/tex]
[tex]\psi(\xi)=a_0[\sqrt[4]{\frac{m\omega}{\pi\hbar}}exp(-\frac{\xi^2}{2})]+a_1[\frac{1}{2}2\xi\sqrt[4]{\frac{m\omega}{\pi\hbar}}exp(-\frac{\xi^2}{2})]+a_2[\frac{1}{2\sqrt{2}}\sqrt[4]{\frac{m\omega}{\pi\hbar}}(4\xi^2-2)exp(-\frac{\xi^2}{2})]+a_3[\frac{1}{4\sqrt{3}}\sqrt[4]{\frac{m\omega}{\pi\hbar}}(8\xi^3-12\xi)exp(-\frac{\xi^2}{2})][/tex]
I figured that since there are only supposed to be ##\xi^3##, then in front of the equation with ##\xi^3## I should put something that would change ##\frac{1}{4\sqrt{3}}\sqrt[4]{\frac{m\omega}{\pi\hbar}}(8\xi^3-12\xi)exp(-\frac{\xi^2}{2})]## into just ##\xi^3##, so ##a_3=\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}##, and ##a_1=\frac{3\sqrt{3}}{2}##. Where am I making mistake?
 
Last edited:
  • #27
You're getting closer. How do you know the coefficient of ##\xi^3## is supposed to be ##\sqrt[4]{\frac{m\omega}{\pi\hbar}}## without knowing specifically what ##\psi(\xi)## equals? Did you ever work out what the normalization constant ##N## is equal to?
 
  • #28
Actually I did, but completely forgot about it:P thank You:) It should be equal ##N^2=\frac{2m^2\omega^2}{exp(m\omega x^2)(m\omega x^2-1)}##. Now I should substitute it to the equation on the left side right?
 
  • #29
That's not right. ##N## is a constant. It doesn't depend on ##x##.
 
  • #30
ok, it should be indefinite integral, so ##N^2=\frac{8(-\hbar m\omega)^\frac{7}{2}}{15\sqrt{\pi}}##, right?
now it should be ok to substitute it to the left side of the equation
 
  • #31
That's close, but you seem to have made a few algebra errors. You should get
$$N^2 = \frac{8}{15\sqrt{\pi}}\alpha^7$$ where ##\alpha## is as you defined it above.
 
  • #32
I tried again, but I came to conclusion that ##N## should stand in front of one expression, in this case
##Na\frac{1}{4\sqrt{3}}\sqrt[4]{\frac{m\omega}{\pi\hbar}}(8\xi^3-12\xi)exp(-\frac{\xi^2}{2})##, and the coefficient came out as ##N\frac{4\sqrt{3}}{8c_3}##. Is it correct?
 
Last edited:
  • #33
I have no idea what that means.
 
  • #34
I got lost. I don't know where to include the ##N## factor in the formula for the ##\psi(\xi)##. I know that ##c_n=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2^n n!}}\sqrt[4]{\frac{m\omega}{\pi\hbar}}##,but I don't know how to mix the constant ##N## into this- should it just stand in front of one of the expressions, or should it truncate- I have no idea now.
 
Last edited:
  • #35
I am at the point where I know that my function is supposed to be a sum of eigenfunctions, but the constants are something I don't know how to calculate...
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
2K
Back
Top