Harmonic oscillator's energy levels

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a one-dimensional harmonic oscillator and the properties of its wave function, specifically focusing on energy levels and probabilities associated with measurements. The original poster presents a wave function and poses questions about the available energy measurements and probabilities after a specific energy outcome.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between the given wave function and the energy levels of the harmonic oscillator, referencing the Hamiltonian and energy formulas. There are attempts to identify eigenstates and their corresponding probabilities, with some participants questioning how to derive these from the wave function.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively discussing the connection between the wave function and the eigenstates of the harmonic oscillator. Some have provided insights into the mathematical background, while others express confusion about deriving eigenstates and coefficients. There is a recognition of the need to understand the orthogonality of eigenstates and how to express the wave function as a linear combination of these states.

Contextual Notes

There are indications of confusion regarding the normalization of the wave function and the specific form of the eigenfunctions. Participants are also grappling with the implications of the power of x in the wave function and how it relates to the number of energy levels available.

  • #31
That's close, but you seem to have made a few algebra errors. You should get
$$N^2 = \frac{8}{15\sqrt{\pi}}\alpha^7$$ where ##\alpha## is as you defined it above.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
I tried again, but I came to conclusion that ##N## should stand in front of one expression, in this case
##Na\frac{1}{4\sqrt{3}}\sqrt[4]{\frac{m\omega}{\pi\hbar}}(8\xi^3-12\xi)exp(-\frac{\xi^2}{2})##, and the coefficient came out as ##N\frac{4\sqrt{3}}{8c_3}##. Is it correct?
 
Last edited:
  • #33
I have no idea what that means.
 
  • #34
I got lost. I don't know where to include the ##N## factor in the formula for the ##\psi(\xi)##. I know that ##c_n=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2^n n!}}\sqrt[4]{\frac{m\omega}{\pi\hbar}}##,but I don't know how to mix the constant ##N## into this- should it just stand in front of one of the expressions, or should it truncate- I have no idea now.
 
Last edited:
  • #35
I am at the point where I know that my function is supposed to be a sum of eigenfunctions, but the constants are something I don't know how to calculate...
 
  • #36
Again, it's impossible to see where you're going wrong when all you do is post your incorrect results. This is especially relevant in your case because, to put it bluntly, your math skills are very poor. You seem to be making basic mistakes that you shouldn't be making if you're taking this course.

Show your calculation of the normalization constant N. Note it should absolutely nothing to do with the expansion in terms of eigenfunctions.
 
  • #37
ok, normalization constant is equal to ##N=\frac{2\sqrt{2}\sqrt[4]{\frac({m\omega}{\hbar})^7}}{\sqrt{15}\sqrt[4]{\pi}}##. Then I have the wave function with substituted values ##\psi(\xi)=H(\xi)exp(-\frac{\xi^2}{2})##, where ##H(\xi)## are hermite polynomials, so in my case it should look like ##\psi(\xi)=H_0(\xi)exp(-\frac{\xi^2}{2})+H_1exp(-\frac{\xi^2}{2})+H_2exp(-\frac{\xi^2}{2})+H_3exp(-\frac{\xi^2}{2})## where ##H_n(\xi)= \sum_{n=0}^\infty a_n\xi^n##. Where in all this is the normalization constant? Is it somewhere in ##a_n##? Also, in the previous posts You told me about ##C_n##, for which the formula is ##C_n=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2^n n!}}(\sqrt[4]{\frac{m\omega}{\pi\hbar}}## which also I don't understand where it came from. The only difference I see is the lower index of ##\psi(\xi)## function: ##\psi(\xi)=H_n exp(-\frac{\xi^2}{2})## and ##\psi_n (\xi)=C_n H_n(\xi)exp(-\frac{\xi^2}{2})##. How to understand this?
 
  • #38
No, that's wrong. Use ##\psi## only for the given wave function. Use ##\phi_n## for the eigenfunctions.

Write out explicitly what the first four normalized eigenfunctions ##\phi_0(\xi)##, ##\phi_1(\xi)##, ##\phi_2(\xi)##, and ##\phi_3(\xi)## are. Figure out what those are first.
 
  • #39
ok, so it should go like this:
##\phi_0(\xi)=\sqrt[4]{(\frac{m\omega}{\pi\hbar}}exp(-\frac{\xi^2}{2})##
##\phi_1(\xi)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\sqrt[4]{(\frac{m\omega}{\pi\hbar}}2\xi exp(-\frac{\xi^2}{2})##
##\phi_2(\xi)=\frac{1}{2\sqrt{2}}\sqrt[4]{(\frac{m\omega}{\pi\hbar}}(4\xi^2-2)exp(-\frac{\xi^2}{2})##
##\phi_3(\xi)=\frac{1}{4\sqrt{3}}\sqrt[4]{(\frac{m\omega}{\pi\hbar}}(8\xi^3-12\xi)exp(-\frac{\xi^2}{2})##
 
  • #40
Now show your calculations for ##N##.
 
  • #41
I didn't calculate the integral myself, I used Wolframalpha to do this, but the result came out as ##\frac{\sqrt{15}\sqrt[4]{\pi}}{2\sqrt{2}\sqrt[4]({\frac{m\omega}{\hbar})^7}}##
 
  • #42
What integral?
 
  • #43
the integral from minus infinity to plus infinity of squared wavefunction (wavefunction times its conjugate)
 
  • #44
Will you please provide a complete explanation of what you're doing rather just than bits and pieces?
 
  • #45
Ok, I normalized the given wave function ##\psi(x)=Nx^3exp(-\frac{m\omega x^2}{2\hbar})## with the integral ##\int_{-\infty}^ {+\infty} N^2 x^6 exp(-\frac{m\omega x^2}{\hbar})\,dx##. Thanks to that I obtained ##N##. Then I substituted the values ##\xi=x\alpha##, ##\lambda=\frac{2E}{\hbar\omega}## and ##\alpha=\sqrt{\frac{m\omega}{\hbar}}##. Thanks to this I obtained the formula
##\psi(\xi)=H(\xi)exp(-\frac{\xi^2}{2})##.
 
  • #46
Substituted into what? What's ##H(\xi)## supposed to be, and why are you writing it like that? Where does ##\lambda = 2E/\hbar\omega## come into this?
 
  • #47
After the substitution the Schrödinger equations becomes ##\frac{d^2 \psi(\xi)}{d \xi^2}+(\lambda-\xi^2)\psi(\xi)=0## for the region ##|\xi|\rightarrow\infty##. For finite value of E the quantity ##\lambda## becomes negligible with respect to ##\xi^2## in the limit ##|\xi|\rightarrow\infty##, so equation reduces to ##(\frac{d^2}{d\xi^2})\psi(\xi)=0##. It is verified for large ##|\xi|## that equation is satisfied by functions ##\psi(\xi)=\xi^p exp(\pm\frac{\xi^2}{2})##, where p is some finite value. The wave function has to bounded everywhere, so only physically acceptable solution must contain the minus sign in the exponent, so I am looking for the equation of form ##\psi(\xi)=H(\xi)exp(-\frac{\xi^2}{2})##.
 
  • #48
and according to textbook now I should do this ##\frac{d^2 H}{d\xi^2}-2\xi\frac{dH}{d\xi}+(\lambda-1)H=0##
 
  • #49
You're going off on a tangent. Reread post 16. Use the eigenfunctions you wrote down in post 39.
 
  • #50
It came to solving following equation:
##\frac{2\sqrt{2}(\frac{m\omega}{\hbar})^\frac{7}{4}}{\sqrt{15}\sqrt[4]{\pi}} x^3 exp(-\frac{m\omega x^2}{2\hbar})=exp(-\frac{m\omega x^2}{2\hbar})\sqrt[4]{\frac{m\omega}{\hbar\pi}}[(a_0+a_1\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\sqrt{\frac{m\omega}{\hbar}}x+a_2 \frac{1}{2\sqrt{2}}(\frac{m\omega}{\hbar}x^2-2)+a_3\frac{1}{4\sqrt{3}}(8x^3 \frac{m\omega}{\hbar}\sqrt{\frac{m\omega}{\hbar}}-12\sqrt{\frac{m\omega}{\hbar}}x))]##. I hope I didn't make any typos.
 
Last edited:
  • #51
Good! You still have a few typos, and it would have been easier to rewrite the lefthand side in terms of ##\xi## to get
$$\sqrt{\frac{8}{15}} \sqrt[4]{\frac{m\omega}{\hbar\pi}} \, \xi^3 e^{-\xi^2/2} = \sqrt[4]{\frac{m\omega}{\hbar\pi}} \, e^{-\xi^2/2} \left[a_0 + \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} a_1 (2\xi) + \frac{1}{\sqrt{8}} a_2 (4\xi^2-2) + \frac{1}{\sqrt{48}} a_3 (8\xi^3-12\xi)\right]$$ or, equivalently,
$$\sqrt{\frac{8}{15}} \, \xi^3 = a_0 + \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} a_1 (2\xi) + \frac{1}{\sqrt{8}} a_2 (4\xi^2-2) + \frac{1}{\sqrt{48}} a_3 (8\xi^3-12\xi).$$ Can you take it from there?
 
  • #52
Yes, thank You:D I finally calculated the coefficients ##a_1=\sqrt{\frac{3}{5}}## and ##a_3=\sqrt{\frac{2}{5}}##. I hope that his time they are correct. Now I need to calculate the energies corresponding to those eigen functions by solving Schrödinger equation, and coefficients squared are their probabilities, right?
 
  • #53
Those look reasonable. The squares of the coefficients are indeed the probabilities; however, while it's a good exercise to go through at least once, you should not have to solve the Schrödinger equation for this problem. It's probably already done in your textbook. You should be familiar with the basic results.
 
  • #54
of course You were right, I forgot about the most basic formula for energy levels:P Now there is last part of the problem-calculate the probability of finding the particle in the classically forbidden region- I thought about using this formula: ##P_n=2 \int_|x_n|^{+\infty} |\psi(\xi)|^2 \,d\xi. ##
 
Last edited:
  • #55
about the second part of the problem: I tried to calculate the probability of finding a particle of energy ##e_3=\frac{3}{2}\hbar\omega## using a formula ##P(E=E_1)=\frac{2}{\sqrt{\pi}2^1 1!}\int_\sqrt{3}^{+\infty} exp(-\xi^2){H_1}^2(\xi)\,dx##, but the result comes out as 0,06696. Where am I making a mistake?
 
  • #56
Could someone please tell me if the formula I chose is right?
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K