Harmonic Vibration-Is any data missing here

  • Thread starter Thread starter jrm2002
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Data Harmonic
jrm2002
Messages
54
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A structure modeled as a damped spring mass system with mg=2520 lb., k= 89,000 lb/inches,and damping constant c = 112 lb.sec/inches is subjected to a harmonic exciting force.
Determine a)Natural frequency
b)Damping ratio
c)Amplitude of the exciting force when the peak amplitude of of of the vibrating mass is measured to be 0.37 inches.
d)The Amplitude of the exciting force when the amplitude
measured at the peak frequency assumed to be resonant
frequency.

Homework Equations



a)Natural frequency can be determined as the ratio of the square root of stiffness to mass
b)Damping ratio is the ratio of the damping coefficient to critical damping
(2*m*natural frequency)


The Attempt at a Solution



Considering the question (c)

To get, Amplitude of the exciting force when the peak amplitude of the vibrating mass is measured to be 0.37 inches.
Now, amplitude of the vibarating mass is a function of frequency ratio(forcing frequency to natural frequency) as well as the amplitude of the vibrating mass?

So how to obtain the amplitude of the vibrating mass??

Similarly question(d)??

Please , please help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top