Comparing K and k in Hecht's Optics Book

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter manimaran1605
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Book Optics
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion clarifies the distinction between propagation number (K) and wave number (k) as defined in Hecht's Optics book. K is defined as K=2π/λ, representing units of radians/m, while k is defined as k=1/λ, representing cycles/m. The confusion arises from the notation, where K, k, and κ (kappa) are used interchangeably, leading to misunderstandings. It is essential to recognize the differences in units to apply the correct mathematical expressions in wave equations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of wave mechanics
  • Familiarity with Hecht's Optics terminology
  • Basic knowledge of angular frequency (ω)
  • Ability to interpret mathematical notation in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the mathematical implications of K=2π/λ in wave equations
  • Explore the significance of wave number (k) in harmonic functions
  • Investigate the historical context of using κ (kappa) in spectroscopy
  • Review equation (2.24) in Hecht's Optics and its relation to other wave equations
USEFUL FOR

Students of optics, physicists, and educators seeking clarity on wave mechanics and notation in Hecht's Optics book.

manimaran1605
Messages
60
Reaction score
0
What is the difference between propagation number(K) and wave number(k) described in Optics book written by hecht

He defined K=2π/λ and k=1/λ and both of them have the same units (i.e, meter inverse)
What does wave number of a Harmonic function tells about?
 
Science news on Phys.org
The units look the same, but they aren't quite the same. It's a somewhat confusing notation in my opinion (especially when you use 'K' and 'k'!)

K=2π/λ is in units of radians/m and k=1/λ has units cycles/m, where "radians" and "cycles" are usually omitted. You just have to remember which kind of units you're using, so you know whether there needs to be a factor of 2π inside the sine/cosine/exponential.

For example, a wave of "propagation number(K)" would be sin(Kx), while a wave with "wave number(k)" would be sin(2πkx).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
manimaran1605 said:
[Hecht] defined [propagation number] K=2π/λ and [wave number] k=1/λ

You have it backwards. He defines the propagation number as ##k = 2 \pi / \lambda## (lower-case Latin letter "k") and the wave number as ##\kappa = 1 / \lambda## (lower-case Greek letter "kappa", not upper-case Latin letter "K"). Those different symbols (##k##, ##\kappa##, and ##K## in LaTeX; or k, κ, and K in PF's default font) tend to confuse people. Look carefully! :smile:

As olivermsun noted, the units are different. ##k## is much more commonly used. ##\kappa## is mainly used by spectroscopists. I don't know if they have a practical reason for it, or if it's just a historical convention.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
The ##k = 2 \pi / \lambda## version is often convenient for working with waves when you also use the angular frequency ##\omega = 2 \pi / T## (where ##T## is the wave period).

That way, you can write things like ##e^{i(kx - \omega t)}## without having ##2\pi##s all over the place. :smile:
 
olivermsun said:
That way, you can write things like ##e^{i(kx - \omega t)}## without having ##2\pi##s all over the place. :smile:

Exactly. The OP (manimaran1605) should compare equation (2.24) in Hecht with the other equations in that group on page 16, which are different ways of writing the same wave equation using different combinations of constants.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
33K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K