Has a Man-Made Black Hole Really Been Created?

  • Thread starter Thread starter theCandyman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Black hole Hole
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on skepticism regarding claims of a man-made black hole, with participants questioning the validity of the media's portrayal of scientific achievements. Some believe the article lacks depth and clarity, suggesting it may be exaggerating the significance of the discovery. Humor is introduced with a light-hearted comment comparing a man-made black hole to Congress. Overall, the conversation reflects a mix of curiosity and skepticism about the scientific claims made in the article. The topic raises important questions about the accuracy of media reporting on complex scientific topics.
theCandyman
Messages
397
Reaction score
2
I ran across this internet news article today, it seemed interesting, but the article is not too informative. Does anyone here think that a black hole was really created, or is this the media 'hyping up' some other type of scientific achievement?

The article is here: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/4357613.stm.


Edit: Sorry, there seems to alreay be a thread on this in the 'Scepticism and debunking' fourm. It is here: https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=67745.
 
Last edited:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
There's a man-made black hole, alright. It's called Congress. :biggrin:
 
Danger said:
There's a man-made black hole, alright. It's called Congress. :biggrin:

:smile: :smile: :smile:
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top