Can Prerequisites Lead to Unexpected Passions?

AI Thread Summary
Prerequisites can unexpectedly spark new interests, as individuals often find themselves drawn to foundational subjects while preparing for their primary studies. A personal experience highlights how a desire to understand general relativity led to a newfound passion for differential geometry, overshadowing the original interest. Similarly, the need to grasp set theory while studying topology resulted in a deeper appreciation for set theory itself. This phenomenon illustrates the natural progression of self-study, where exploring prerequisites can open up new avenues of fascination. Ultimately, engaging with foundational topics can significantly reshape one's academic focus and interests.
andytoh
Messages
357
Reaction score
3
Have you ever studied from a subject, realized that you were lacking in some prerequisites, then started reading up on the prerequisites, and then realized that you have become more interested in the prerequisite subject(s) than the original subject?

I have. Years ago, I was very interested in general relativity, but realized I needed to learn more differential geometry to study it. So I started reading differential geometry, and then fell in love with differential geometry. Now my main interests are differential geometry and differential topology, and I don't think about general relativity as much as I used to. Also, a long time ago I was studying topology, but I realized I needed to study more set theory. Then I became very interested in set theory (though I still like topology very much now).
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
It's inevitable in any self-studier's life.
 
That's like me trying to look up a word in a dictionary- often to ever get to it because I start looking at definitions of other words along the way!
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top