Have you heard anything about AstroTech's low-cost Ritchey-Chrétien scopes?

  • Thread starter Thread starter chemisttree
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
AstroTech offers low-cost Ritchey-Chrétien telescopes, including a 6" f/9 model priced at $1,300 and an 8" f/9 model at $3,000. Users express concern about potential collimation issues with RC scopes and note that reviews are scarce, as the models are relatively new. The scopes may lack sufficient back-focus for visual observing, although they could be suitable for DSLR astrophotography. Enthusiasts are increasingly using small APOs with fast focal ratios for impressive astrophotography results. Overall, the discussion highlights a growing interest in affordable astrophotography equipment and the potential of AstroTech's offerings.
chemisttree
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Messages
3,949
Reaction score
781
AstroTech has an f/9 6" for around $1,300 and an f/9, 8" for $3,000. Anyone heard anything bad about these? I've been pretty impressed with AT's products so far... my AT80ED APO is pretty nice for the price and would make a good guider for something like this. I've heard that collimation can be a problem with RC scopes. Any experience with them?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
I don't know of anybody yet who has posted reviews on this scope. It appears to lack the back-focus for any sort of visual observing (unless perhaps you can view without a diagonal). That aside, if you're serious about DSLR astrophotography you might be pleased with this OTA.

Lots of folks getting into astrophotography these days are using small APOs with fast focal ratios, and some are getting extremely impressive results. Look what Greg Parker can do with a Sky 90.

http://www.newforestobservatory.com/
 
I posted this before I looked on Cloudy Nights for info. The scopes appear to be brand new and no one has one yet. The one review (if you can call it that) used the prototype... and there are pics as well.

See http://www.cloudynights.com/ubbthre...age/0/view/collapsed/sb/5/o/all/fpart/2/vc/1". Backfocus appears to long enough for visual, if you can believe the pic.

That Tak as well as others were on my list. Thanks for the website, definitely food for thought.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
chemisttree said:
That Tak as well as others were on my list. Thanks for the website, definitely food for thought.
You're welcome! Greg (imager) and Noel Carboni (image processor) are members of an astronomy forum that I'm on, and they have an incredible astrophotography image book in the works. They have produced so many APODs that I have lost count!

Greg is pulling off stuff with the Sky 90 that I could never have accomplished with my 6" Astro-Physics APO during the film days. I've got a couple of Canon 30Ds, and after I've reconciled some financial doldrums (unemployed due to medical disability) I hope to house that instrument in a roll-off-roof observatory and jump into digital astrophotography.
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...

Similar threads

Replies
27
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Back
Top