Have You Noticed the Symmetry of Primes in the Sieve of Eratosthenes?

  • Thread starter Thread starter r2i
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Symmetry
r2i
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
just got dumped out and lost my thread, so will keep this brief and add later once accepeted

www.primepatterns.wordpress.com

anyone noticed the symmetry of primes (well pseudoprimes if you must) starting at each p#/2 i.e. 105, 1155, 15015?

they arise from the Sieve of Erathosthenes and give good explanations of prime distributions and patterns
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If I understand you correctly, Dirichlet proved that 'symmetry' in 1837.
 
I thought there was some similarity, just couldn't bridge the gap. So why is the 6n-1, 6n+1 framework mentioned so regularly whilst the next step (sorry for the lack of formatting - it's coloured and formatted on the website):

-14 31 61 151 181 211
-8 37 67 97 127 157
-4 11 41 71 101 131 191
-2 13 43 73 103 163 193 line of symmetry at 15-45-90-120-165-195
+2 17 47 107 137 167 197
+4 19 79 109 139 199
+8 23 53 83 113 173
+14 29 59 89 149 179

is mentioned much less (the matching locations for pairs are of passing interest) and the general trend not at all, although all sorts of papers are produced attempting to show patterns in gaps between primes?
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top