Having a very hard time in my PRECALC CLASS

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on confusion regarding a precalculus problem involving factoring and combining like terms. The original expression is complex, leading to questions about how certain coefficients were derived in the professor's solution. Specifically, the participant is puzzled by the emergence of the numbers 6 and 5 in the final factored form. Clarification is provided that the 6 arises from factoring out a 2 from the original product of 3 and 4, while the 5 remains unchanged. Understanding these steps is crucial for mastering the factoring process in precalculus.
DeepSpace9
Messages
57
Reaction score
1
Having a very hard time in my PRECALC CLASS.
When they facto problems they start pulling numbers out of numbers that aren't there..
Example..

3(4x+5)^2 (4)(5x+1)^2 + (4x+5)^3 (2) (5x+1)(5)

Professor said this was the answer.

a) 2(4x+5)^2(5x+1)[6(5x+1)+5(4x+5)]
=
b) 2(4x+5)^2(5x+1)[50x+31] (After combining like terms)

My questions is

Where I labeled a) where did she get the 6 from and the 5 from?
I can see she got the 5 from the original problem, but I thought if she factored out a 2 as a GCF the 5 would be reduced to a smaller number, and the 6 comes out of no where.. HELP
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org


Thanks for the help guys.
 


Hey DeepSpace9.

Recall that 3*4 = 12 = 6*2 and 5*2 = 10 = 5*2 [Look at the factorization again carefully with the hint mentioned]
 
So the 6 comes from the fact that (3)(4) = 12 and since I factor out a (2) I would need a (6) to = 12 again? I didn't think we could use a 6 since it was not in the original problem.
 
Yes that's pretty much it.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Back
Top