Having trouble visualizing something about acceleration

  • Thread starter Thread starter Byrne
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Acceleration
AI Thread Summary
Two cars accelerate at different rates: one at 1.35 m/s² for 20 seconds and the other at 2.70 m/s² for 10 seconds. Despite the second car accelerating faster, it travels half the distance of the first car due to the shorter time interval. Both cars reach the same final velocity, but the first car's longer acceleration time results in greater displacement. Understanding this concept can be aided by visualizing average speed and the relationship between time and distance in acceleration. Clarifying these points can enhance comprehension beyond mere memorization.
Byrne
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
Okay, so say one car accelerates for 20 seconds at a speed of 1.35 m/s2 while a second car accelerates for 10 seconds at a speed of 2.70 m/s2. Notice that the second car accelerates twice as quickly, but in half the time. Now my question lies in describing the displacement of these two cars. They will both reach the same final velocity, assuming all accelerations stops after the aforementioned time intervals. If you were to graph these intervals, it is pretty easy to see that the second car travels half the distance as the first car in the 10 second interval. I know this is true because of the graph, but for some reason I am having troubles visualizing this. Could anyone may paint a word picture for me to help better my visualizing of this. It may seem pretty simple, but I'd rather be able to fully understand rather than just memorize.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Have a look at the simulations at http://wps.aw.com/aw_young_physics_11" . Click on the icons in the text to open the simulations. You need Macromedia Flash player 6.0.65 plugin installed in order to run the simulations.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
One thought that might help is to realize that both cars have the same average speed (v_{ave} = (v_i + v_f)/2), but since the first car moves for twice the time it goes twice as far.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top