Head on collision between mirror image vehicles

AI Thread Summary
In a head-on collision between mirror image vehicles traveling at 65 mph, each vehicle experiences a force equivalent to hitting a non-elastic wall at 65 mph, not 130 mph. The total impact force may be considered 130 mph, but it is effectively distributed between the two vehicles. The key factor is that both vehicles undergo the same deceleration, leading to similar forces acting on each. Misunderstandings about force and energy terminology were clarified, emphasizing that force is not measured in mph. A related Mythbusters episode confirmed that the collision dynamics align with this understanding.
cimmee
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I have a question and I would like some help.

Assuming mirror image vehicles hitting at 65mph. Is the force exacted on each vehicle equal to 130mph or 65 mph. My assumption is that it would be the same as hitting an inelastic brick wall..

Thank ya'll in advance..
 
Science news on Phys.org
Each vehicle experiences a force equal to hitting a non-elastic wall at 65 mph. The reason is that, even though the total force for the collision is 130 MPH, it is spread over the 2 vehicles.
 
Drakkith said:
The reason is that, even though the total force for the collision is 130 MPH, it is spread over the 2 vehicles.
Force is not measured in MPH. Force is also not "spread" (maybe you mean energy).

The reason for "same forces" is simple: same (de)acceleration.
 
I had a conversation with a dolt that attempted to tell me that the mirror image crash caused 130mph worth of damage to both vehicles.

And yes I know the language is not precise.

Feel free to correct me, I would like to know the correct terms. I golf with a physics prof on occasion.
 
A.T. said:
Force is not measured in MPH. Force is also not "spread" (maybe you mean energy).

The reason for "same forces" is simple: same (de)acceleration.

Yes. That is what I meant.
 
Also, there was a mythbusters episode that tested this. The result was that the collision is equal to each vehicle hitting a wall at the speed they were going.
 
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...
Back
Top