Heat flux with oscillating heat sink

AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the impact of oscillation on heat transfer in a system with a heat source, heat sink, and a material for heat flow. It begins with the basic heat transfer equation, highlighting the factors influencing heat transfer rate. The user questions whether vibrating the cold side would decrease heat transfer, but considers the potential for oscillation to enhance heat transfer, similar to how a fan improves convection. There is curiosity about the effects of high-frequency oscillation, including friction and changes in surface area, on overall heat flux. The conversation suggests that oscillation may improve heat transfer under certain conditions, warranting further investigation into its dynamics.
tempneff
Messages
82
Reaction score
3
I am curious about the effects of oscillation in a heat transfer system. For example consider a simple system consisting of a heat source, a heat sink, and some generic material through which we will flow heat.

http://tempneff.com/Hflux.png

If we stack them all together, without thermal grease or other treatments, then they should transfer heat by \frac{Q}{t}=\frac{\kappa A(T_{hot}-T_{cold})}{d}

where Q= heat transferred, t=time, \kappa = thermal conductivity of barrier, A = area, T= temp, and d=thickness of barrier. Right?

What would be the effect if I were to vibrate the cold side? Instinctively I thought it would interrupt heat flow decreasing Q/t, but I am reading (unless I misunderstand) that sometimes heat transfer is improved by oscillation.

Any thought?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
If i understand you correctly, I think the logic is similar to having a fan blowing to the heatsink on the other end, decreases Q/t because it increases heat dispersion thus improves natural convection on the outer surface, therefore improve Heat flux to surrounding.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
I'll buy that. I still wonder about the magnitude of effect from other dynamics. At high frequency would the friction created have a noticeable effect on the net flux? What about the change in surface area when part of the cold block is shifted off of the 'material'?
 
Higher frequency means more oscillation, so its similar to a higher RPM fan which gives better cooling measure..
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top