Heat Absorbed to Melt Ice & Warm Water to 10°C

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sabres151
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Heat Ice
AI Thread Summary
To determine the heat absorbed by a 4.00 kg block of ice transitioning from -20°C to water at 10°C, three energy calculations are necessary: heating the ice, melting the ice, and heating the resulting water. The first and third calculations utilize the specific heat capacities of ice and water, respectively, while the second involves the latent heat of fusion, which is the energy needed to melt the ice. The specific heat capacity of ice is 2000 J/kg°C, and for water, it is 4180 J/kg°C, with the latent heat of fusion at 335,000 J/kg. Understanding these concepts is crucial for accurately calculating the total heat absorbed. The discussion emphasizes the importance of these energy calculations in thermodynamics.
Sabres151
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
A 4.00kg block of ice is removed from a freezer where its temperature was maintained at -20C. Find the heat that the ice must absorb in order to warm up to its melting point, melt, and then the water warms up to 10.0 degrees. The specific heat capacity of ice = 2000J/kg-degrees C, the specific heat of water is 4180 J/kg-degrees C and the latent heat of fusion for ice is 335000 J/kg.

I don't even know where to start.
Something with this: Q = Cm(delta T)
DeltaT = 30 degrees C
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
you need a 3 energies -

one to heat the ice
one to melt the ice
one to heat the water

th first and third are calculated the way you state (but with different speicifc heats, since they are different for water and ice)
the second is calculated by mass * specific heat capacity
 
stunner5000pt said:
you need a 3 energies -

one to heat the ice
one to melt the ice
one to heat the water

th first and third are calculated the way you state (but with different speicifc heats, since they are different for water and ice)
the second is calculated by mass * specific heat capacity

Ok, that clarifies a few things then. Thanks for the help Stunner. Though I'm not exactly sure what "latent heat of fusion" means, I think it applies to the mass equation..
 
stunner5000pt said:
you need a 3 energies -

one to heat the ice
one to melt the ice
one to heat the water

th first and third are calculated the way you state (but with different speicifc heats, since they are different for water and ice)
the second is calculated by mass * specific heat capacity

Ok, that clarifies a few things then. Thanks for the help Stunner. Though I'm not exactly sure what "latent heat of fusion" means, I think it applies to the mass equation..
 
stunner5000pt said:
you need a 3 energies -

one to heat the ice
one to melt the ice
one to heat the water

th first and third are calculated the way you state (but with different speicifc heats, since they are different for water and ice)
the second is calculated by mass * specific heat capacity

Ok, that clarifies a few things then. Thanks for the help Stunner. Though I'm not exactly sure what "latent heat of fusion" means, I think it applies to the mass equation..
 
Sabres151 said:
Ok, that clarifies a few things then. Thanks for the help Stunner. Though I'm not exactly sure what "latent heat of fusion" means, I think it applies to the mass equation..

latent heat of fusion is the amount of energy required per kilogram to melt the ice
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top