Heat of Reaction 53: DH = 14.2 kJ/mol CO

  • Thread starter Thread starter ScrubsFan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Heat Reaction
AI Thread Summary
The heat of reaction for the given equation CO + NO2 → CO2 + NO is calculated to be 14.2 kJ/mol. The activation energy for the forward reaction is 135 kJ/mol. To find the activation energy for the reverse reaction, one must add the heat of reaction to the activation energy of the forward reaction. This results in an activation energy of 149.2 kJ/mol for the reverse reaction. The calculations align with the principles of chemical reaction energy profiles.
ScrubsFan
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
53. For the reaction

CO + NO2 ---> CO2 + NO

The activation energy for the forward reaction is 135 KJ/mol of CO reacted.

a) Determine the heat of reaction.


DH = Hf products - Hf reactants

= (197.9 + 240.5) - (213.6 + 210.6)

= 14.2 kJ/mol

b) From the data given, and the DHr for the reaction, determine the activation energy for the reverse reaction.


Im pretty sure I did part a right, but how do I do part b?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Try thinking of the reaction graphically. Have you seen a graph of a chemical reaction, Energy vs. Time? Try drawing it out, and determine what the activation energy for the forward rxn and the heat of reaction represent graphically. Then figure out what the activation energy for the reverse reaction would look like, and see if you can then figure it out from the other values.
 
Yes I have seen and read about activation energy, and the only thing I could think of for this problem is that the activation of the forward reaction is given as 135 kJ/mol.

135 kJ/mol + 14.2 kJ/mol

= 149.2 kJ/mol

So the activation energy for the reverse reaction would be 149.2 kJ/mol?
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top