Does Increasing Fan Speed Reduce CPU Cooling Efficiency?

In summary: This is why increasing the airflow speed on a fan does not always lead to a reduction in the CPU's temperature.In summary, the faster the fan is moving, the less heat it can transfer to the air surrounding it. This is due to the higher volume of air being moved, which reduces the efficiency of the process. However, if you increase the airflow speed enough, the heat transfer to a given volume of air becomes greater, even though the "efficiency" is lower.
  • #1
DHF
247
32
Hello,

I was in a discussion with a Friend regarding cooling systems for computers. We were discussing different air cooling methods for CPUs and he claimed that if the fan was moving at high enough RPMs that the heat transfer from heat sink to the surrounding air would drop in efficiency. He claimed that if the air was moving fast enough that the heat would not have time to transfer to the air moving over it. I have been building computers for many years and I thought I was fairly versed in the design and function of the various systems but I have to admit I have never heard of anything like this. The nearest I could think of is how air heats up when you compress it but we are not talking about air compression in this case, we are talking about standard fans moving air through a grated piece of aluminum.

If anyone has information about this, I would love to hear it. Frankly the concept seems very confusing.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #3
It is true but probably not relevant. The faster the air moves, the less heat a given volume of air can absorb. That's true. But a larger volume of air is being moved, so the overall heat transfer is still higher, even though the "efficiency" is lower.
 
  • #4
How much air would we be talking? The typical heat sink is 120mm squared and the typical fan moves anywhere from 40CFM to 90CFM. How many CFM would need to be moved before we saw diminishing returns?
 
  • #5
I think he has it backwards. As you increase the rpm of the fan, you are not only speeding up the air, but also increasing the volume of air, as Russ pointed out. This will of course reduce the heat transferred to a given volume of air (i.e. the air will exit cooler, thus reducing the process efficiency, as Russ also pointed out). But it is key that you understand that even though the overall heat transfer into a given volume of air is less, the total heat transfer is greater because there is a greater volume of air to transfer to. That is, with more airflow you get more cooling (to a certain extent defined by the system design).

Another point involved in this is heat transfer coefficient. As the transfer fluid's velocity increases, its heat transfer coefficient generally increases (to a point). This has to do with boundary layers. As convective heat transfer is defined as Qdot=Hc*A*dT, this is obviously beneficial (and one reason why forced convection is better at cooling a surface than free convection).

Then, as the volume of air in contact with the cooling surface has less time to heat up, the dT remains large between the cooling surface and the immediate surrounding air. This is beneficial as well.
 
Last edited:
  • #6
DHF said:
How much air would we be talking? The typical heat sink is 120mm squared and the typical fan moves anywhere from 40CFM to 90CFM. How many CFM would need to be moved before we saw diminishing returns?
Hmm. Thinking about this more, since the heat dissipation of the chip is fixed, the relationship is a simple hyperbola: every time you double the airflow, you halve the temperature difference.
 
  • #7
As russ has just pointed out, increasing the air flow rate doesn't necessarily increase the "heat transfer rate". This is a common misconception. The heat to be removed from a CPU is a function of the CPU's operating condition. For example, for a CPU operating at nominal load the heat dissipation will be fixed according to that condition and will depend on the number of calculations, etc that the CPU is handling at that instance. Increasing the fan speed increases the air flow rate and accordingly increases the heat transfer coefficient (essentially due to reduction in boundary layer thickness). In this case, if the convection equation is to remain balanced, the heat source (CPU) temperature must reduce.
Convection equation:
[itex]\dot{Q}[/itex]=hA([itex]T_{source}[/itex] - [itex]T_{ambient-air}[/itex])
where Q = fixed by CPU = constant
A = heat transfer area = constant
Tambient = air temperature = relatively constant

Therefore, an increase in h (heat transfer coefficient) must lead to a reduction in Tsource
 

1. What is a heat sink and how does it work?

A heat sink is a passive device that is used to dissipate or transfer heat away from a hot object, such as a computer processor. It works by increasing the surface area of the object, allowing more heat to be transferred to the surrounding air.

2. What materials are commonly used in heat sinks?

The most commonly used materials for heat sinks are aluminum and copper, due to their high thermal conductivity and relatively low cost. Other materials such as graphite, ceramic, and composite materials can also be used.

3. How do air cooling systems work with heat sinks?

Air cooling systems work by using fans to move air over the heat sink, which helps to carry away the heat from the object. The heat sink then dissipates the heat to the surrounding air, keeping the object cool.

4. Can heat sinks be used for other applications besides computer processors?

Yes, heat sinks can be used in a variety of other applications where heat needs to be dissipated, such as in power supplies, LED lights, and high-performance vehicles.

5. Are there any downsides to using air cooling with heat sinks?

One potential downside to using air cooling with heat sinks is that it may not be as effective as other cooling methods, such as liquid cooling. Additionally, air cooling can be affected by factors such as ambient temperature and dust accumulation, which can impact its efficiency.

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
21
Views
1K
  • General Engineering
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
25
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
704
  • General Engineering
Replies
23
Views
2K
Back
Top