Heat transfer problem for a long rectangular bar

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on finding the temperature distribution in a long rectangular bar under steady-state conditions, with specific boundary conditions including imposed flux, convection, and fixed temperatures. The original poster has established the differential equation and boundary conditions but struggles to derive the temperature distribution using the superposition method. Suggestions include using three superposition cases instead of two, addressing the boundaries differently in each scenario. The recommended approach involves solving the two additional cases using separation of variables, applying sine series in the x direction and hyperbolic functions in the y direction. This method aims to simplify the problem and achieve an analytical solution.
Nusselt
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Moved from a technical forum, so homework template missing
Summary:: Determine the temperature distribution in a bar (very long– 2D) with rectangular cross section, in steady state, with imposed flux at one face, convection at the opposing face (Tinf, h), and imposed temperature (T1) at the two remaining walls.

I am trying to find the analytical solution to the following problem :

Determine the temperature distribution in a bar (very long– 2D) with rectangular cross section, in steady state, with imposed flux at one face, convection at the opposing face (Tinf, h), and imposed temperature (T1) at the two remaining walls.

I have the differential equation and four boundary conditions , however I can't find the temperature distribution even using the supeposition method ( trying to find the solution with one of the walls adiabatic and the other transferring energy by convection and then finding the solution for one of the walls adiabatic and the other with imposed flux).

Has anyone came across a problem like this?
 

Attachments

  • Esboço placa 1.png
    Esboço placa 1.png
    1.5 KB · Views: 199
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Your figure matches the problem statement, but there are no adiabatic walls mentioned in the problem statement.
 
Chestermiller said:
Your figure matches the problem statement, but there are no adiabatic walls mentioned in the problem statement.
I was describing how i was using the superposition method
 
I like your approach. How do you handle the other two boundaries in each of the two cases?
 
You are on the right track. Instead of using 2 superpositions, use three. The first case is where T is equal to T1 everywhere and the flux ends are both insulated. The other two cases are the ones you already described, but with zero temperatures where T1 had been. These two other cases can be solved by separation of variables, with sine series in the x direction and hyperbolic sines and cosines in the y direction.
 
Thread 'Have I solved this structural engineering equation correctly?'
Hi all, I have a structural engineering book from 1979. I am trying to follow it as best as I can. I have come to a formula that calculates the rotations in radians at the rigid joint that requires an iterative procedure. This equation comes in the form of: $$ x_i = \frac {Q_ih_i + Q_{i+1}h_{i+1}}{4K} + \frac {C}{K}x_{i-1} + \frac {C}{K}x_{i+1} $$ Where: ## Q ## is the horizontal storey shear ## h ## is the storey height ## K = (6G_i + C_i + C_{i+1}) ## ## G = \frac {I_g}{h} ## ## C...

Similar threads

Back
Top