Calculate Energy Needed for Flexinol Contraction in Vacuum

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jai Sankar
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Heating Vacuum
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the energy required for a flexinol wire contraction under specific conditions. The wire has a resistance of 0.33 ohms and requires 4000mA for one second, leading to a power dissipation of approximately 13.2 Watts. It is noted that heating the wire in a vacuum versus air may not significantly affect power consumption due to minimal convection effects over a short duration. However, heat loss calculations involve both convective and radiative components, with the latter being less affected by the medium. The conversation emphasizes the importance of iterative temperature estimations to balance heat loss with electrical power input for accurate modeling.
Jai Sankar
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I have a flexinol wire, and it has a resistance of 0.11 ohms/inch and it requires 4000mA for a 1 second contraction. I was wondering how much energy was required for a 1 second contraction and if I were to heat the flexinol under a vacuum, how much less energy would be required. The flexinol is a cylinder with a radius of 0.020 in and is 3 inches long, a density of 0.235 lb/in^3, and a specific heat of 0.2 cal/g * °C.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
(1)

You have 3 inches of wire so total resistance is 0.33 ohms . Current is 4 Amps .

Power dissipated by a resistance is given by I2R Watts .

One Watt = One Joule / second - so how many Joules are needed for a 1 second ON time ?

(2)

Another calculation could tell you what voltage and Amp-Hour capacity a battery would need to be to supply required current and to give the required number of seconds ON time for your application .

(3)

I don't think that having wire in vacuum as opposed to air would make much difference to power consumption .

nb: Flexinol
 
Last edited:
How much heat would be lost to air rather than a vacuum?
 
Paint it flat black and energy loss is greater, polish it like a mirror, energy loss would be less. Infrared radiates pretty close to equally well in air or in a vacuum. Air does add a convection component, but for 1 second isn't long enough to establish any significant convection current.
 
Jai Sankar said:
How much heat would be lost to air rather than a vacuum?
in a vacuum it will do it's thing slower because the heat can escape the boundary layer faster. the air-to-wire boundary layer is like "R" in thermal insulation equations, thus heat will escape slower so temp will rise faster.
 
Natural convection is a tricky subject, but for a simple geometry like a wire in free air you can make some assumptions to make calculations a bit more manageable.

Your governing equations for heat loss per unit length would be:
  1. Convective Heat Loss: q'_c = \bar hπD(T_s - T_∞)
  2. Radiation heat Loss: q'_r = επDσ(T_s^4 - T_∞^4)
  • q'_c - Convective heat loss
  • q'_r - Radiative heat loss
  • \bar h - Convective coefficient
  • D - Wire diameter
  • ε - Wire emissivity
  • σ - Stefan-Boltzmann constant
  • T_s - Wire temperature
  • T_∞ - Environment temperature
The dimensionless parameters used in the calculation of natural convection are where it gets a little tricky. You're looking for the convective coefficient but it depends on the temperature, so to start you'll guess a temperature and then calculate out the convective coefficient. You can follow an iterative process for estimating steady state temperature until you're able to balance heat loss with power input. So (guess temperature) → (calculate heat loss) → (compare to electrical power put in) → (repeat step 1).

To get the convective coefficient follow these steps:
  1. Calculate Rayleigh number: Ra_{D}=\frac{g\beta\left(T_{s}-T_{inf}\right)D^{3}}{\nu\alpha}
  2. Calculate Nusselt number: \overline{Nu}_{D}=\left\{0.60+\frac{0.387Ra_{D}^{1/6}}{\left[1+\left(0.559/Pr\right)^{9/16}\right]^{8/27}}\right\}^{2}
  3. Calculate convective coeffcient: \overline{h}=\frac{k}{D}\overline{Nu}_{D}
where:
  • \beta=1/T_{s}
  • Prandtl number: Pr = \frac{ν}{α} (ratio of the kinematic viscosity and thermal diffusivity of air)
 
Posted June 2024 - 15 years after starting this class. I have learned a whole lot. To get to the short course on making your stock car, late model, hobby stock E-mod handle, look at the index below. Read all posts on Roll Center, Jacking effect and Why does car drive straight to the wall when I gas it? Also read You really have two race cars. This will cover 90% of problems you have. Simply put, the car pushes going in and is loose coming out. You do not have enuff downforce on the right...
I'm trying to decide what size and type of galvanized steel I need for 2 cantilever extensions. The cantilever is 5 ft. The space between the two cantilever arms is a 17 ft Gap the center 7 ft of the 17 ft Gap we'll need to Bear approximately 17,000 lb spread evenly from the front of the cantilever to the back of the cantilever over 5 ft. I will put support beams across these cantilever arms to support the load evenly
Thread 'What's the most likely cause for this carbon seal crack?'
We have a molded carbon graphite seal that is used in an inline axial piston, variable displacement hydraulic pump. One of our customers reported that, when using the “A” parts in the past, they only needed to replace them due to normal wear. However, after switching to our parts, the replacement cycle seems to be much shorter due to “broken” or “cracked” failures. This issue was identified after hydraulic fluid leakage was observed. According to their records, the same problem has occurred...
Back
Top