Heating Mixture in Thermally Insulated Container - Ice to Boil & Evaporate

AI Thread Summary
In a thermally insulated container, a mixture of ice and water was heated using a 400W immersion heater. Initial temperature measurements showed no change for the first two minutes, followed by a gradual increase, indicating the ice was melting before the temperature began to rise significantly. The user calculated the initial masses of water and ice as 0.515 kg and 0.199 kg, respectively, and estimated that the ice melted in approximately 2:45 minutes. They also calculated that it took about 14:25 minutes for the water to start boiling and 48:02 minutes for half of the water to evaporate. The discussion emphasizes the importance of showing detailed calculations for verification.
olduvai
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
In a thermally insulated container was a mixture of ice and water. Then we have put a immersion heater ( P=400W). We started measure time and at the end of every minute we writed down the heat od mixture. First two minutes the heat wasn't changing, at the end of third it raised about 2°C, at the end of fourth it raised about 8°C, t the end of fifth raised about 8°C, and so on, each by an additional 8°C.

Task:
a) How much ice and how much water was in a container in the beginning? (my answer: mass of water: 0,515kg, mass of ice: 0,199kg)
b) How long did it takes to ice, until it melted? (my answer: 2:45min)
c) How long did it takes until the water started to boil? And how long did it takes until the half of water did evaporate? (my answer: 14:25min and 48:2min)Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
(Sorry i forgot to write the header: )

Can you please check me my work?
And sorry for my english:)
 
olduvai said:
In a thermally insulated container was a mixture of ice and water. Then we have put a immersion heater ( P=400W). We started measure time and at the end of every minute we writed down the heat od mixture. First two minutes the heat wasn't changing, at the end of third it raised about 2°C, at the end of fourth it raised about 8°C, t the end of fifth raised about 8°C, and so on, each by an additional 8°C.

Task:
a) How much ice and how much water was in a container in the beginning? (my answer: mass of water: 0,515kg, mass of ice: 0,199kg)
b) How long did it takes to ice, until it melted? (my answer: 2:45min)
c) How long did it takes until the water started to boil? And how long did it takes until the half of water did evaporate? (my answer: 14:25min and 48:2min)Thanks in advance!

Welcome to the PF.

It helps us out a lot if you show your detailed work for how you arrived at your answers. That way we can just check your work, and do not have to work it all out for ourselves. And if you have an error in your calculations, it is much easier for us to spot if we see your detailed work. :-)
 
a) I suppose that at first the heat was absorbed to ice to melt, so that's why the temeperature of the mixture didn't raise first two minutes. And i also suppose, that at first the ice and water had same degree ( 0°C).
To know what was the mass of each(because the mass of ice after melting was same as before), I counted it from the heat needed to raise the temperature of the mixture about 8°C , when the ice was comply melted:

(P=400W, t=8°, c1=4200kJ/kg)
Q=P*t=c1*t*(m1+m2)
---> (m1+m2)=24000/(42000*8)=5/7

Then I get the second equation. I know that in the third minute temp raised about 2°C, so I substract the heat needed to ice to melt from the heat, which was given the mixture after three minutes.

Q'3=Q3-Lt=P*3*60 - lt*m2

This heat heated the mixture above 2°C: (t2=2°, lt=33200)
Q3-Lt=c1*t2*(m1+m2)

m2= Q3/lt - ((5/7)*c1*t2) / lt
m2= ((P*3*60) / (33200)) - ((4200*2*5)/(332000*7))= 0,199kg

m1... m1+m2=5/7...m1=5/7-0.199=0,515kg
 
Is it right?
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top