Heating water at 100 °C without coolers?

  • Thread starter Thread starter k_amy21
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Heating Water
AI Thread Summary
Exposing metallic materials to water at 100 °C for extended periods raises concerns about safety and equipment setup. The discussion emphasizes the importance of not sealing glass vessels tightly without a safety valve due to potential overpressure risks, especially if the thermostat fails. A suggestion is made to use a double boiler method to mitigate overpressure concerns while allowing for safe sealing of the vessels. Additionally, there are worries about the potential for implosion during a blackout. The user expresses frustration over the need for coolers, as they complicate the setup and fit within the oven, leading to a preference for simpler heating methods despite lacking the necessary equipment like heating mantles and temperature regulators.
k_amy21
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
hi,

I need to expose metallic material in the WATER for a certain period of time (3, 6 and 12 months) at 100 °C (+/- 5 °C) and normal pressure. Is it possible to do that without using coolers?
I was thinking of putting the glass vessels in the oven and closing it with some "special" equipment (please, see the attached file). What do you think, would that be safe and secure so the water does not evaporate and the whole system doesn´t explode because of the overpressure??

Regards
 

Attachments

Chemistry news on Phys.org
I would not close it tight without a safety valve, you need to take into account possible failure of the thermostat. That is assuming in the first place the vessel you are using is capable of sustaining slight overpressure.

Note that in the case of the blackout you may have quite the opposite problem - implosion instead of explosion.
 
Make a double boiler by immersing the glass vessels in boiling water. You could then go ahead and seal the glass vessels tight without concern for overpressure. Just be sure the boiler doesn't run dry.
 
I think this metal part around the vessel is preety secure (like some kind of valve), but these red plastic things which are holding the top I-don´t-know-what´s-it-cold :smile: could loosen after a while.
I am just searching for the easiest way to set up my experiment and it will, obviously, be using the coolers. grrrrrr... It´s not because I need to use the coolers, but it´s because then the whole equipment doesn´t fit in the oven, and therefore I need to use heating mantles and temperature regulators which I don´t have enough! ..gosh.. :cry:
 
Thread 'How to make Sodium Chlorate by Electrolysis of salt water?'
I have a power supply for electrolysis of salt water brine, variable 3v to 6v up to 30 amps. Cathode is stainless steel, anode is carbon rods. Carbon rod surface area 42" sq. the Stainless steel cathode should be 21" sq. Salt is pure 100% salt dissolved into distilled water. I have been making saturated salt wrong. Today I learn saturated salt is, dissolve pure salt into 150°f water cool to 100°f pour into the 2 gallon brine tank. I find conflicting information about brine tank...
Engineers slash iridium use in electrolyzer catalyst by 80%, boosting path to affordable green hydrogen https://news.rice.edu/news/2025/engineers-slash-iridium-use-electrolyzer-catalyst-80-boosting-path-affordable-green Ruthenium is also fairly expensive (a year ago it was about $490/ troy oz, but has nearly doubled in price over the past year, now about $910/ troy oz). I tracks prices of Pt, Pd, Ru, Ir and Ru. Of the 5 metals, rhodium (Rh) is the most expensive. A year ago, Rh and Ir...
Back
Top