Height differences from relative uncertainty of gravimeters

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relative uncertainty of gravimeters, which is noted to be 10-12, equating to a height difference of 3 µm. The relationship between gravitational acceleration and distance is expressed as g proportional to 1/r², leading to the equation Δg/g = -2(Δr)/r. The user struggles with deriving the necessary equations from the differentiation process, specifically relating to the change in gravitational force and height. They seek clarification on the rule used in their calculations, indicating a need for a reference to better understand the differentiation involved. The conversation highlights the complexities of applying calculus to gravitational measurements.
AdrianMachin
Messages
40
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


The best relative gravimeters have a relative uncertainty of 10-12, that corresponds to a height difference of 3 µm.

Homework Equations


g∝(1/r2)
The local gravitational acceleration g outside the Earth is proportional to 1/r2, which means (Δg)/g = -2 (Δr)/r. With (Δg)/g = 10-12 we get Δr = 0.5 * 10-12 r where r is the radius of Earth.

The Attempt at a Solution


I've tried to get to the equation I highlighted in red, but I fail. I know it has derived from taking derivatives, but my derivatives result in different equations.
g∝1/r2 → g=k(1/r2) → ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The rule is derived from ##f(x+\Delta x) = f(x) + f'(x)\Delta x\ + {\mathcal O} (\Delta x)^2## so you get $$
\Delta g = g(x+\Delta x ) - g(x) \approx g'(x) \Delta x \Rightarrow \\ = {-2\over x^3} \Delta x \Rightarrow {\Delta g\over g} = -2 {\Delta x\over x}$$

We usually report the standard deviation which is positive.
 
  • Like
Likes AdrianMachin
BvU said:
The rule is derived from ##f(x+\Delta x) = f(x) + f'(x)\Delta x\ + {\mathcal O} (\Delta x)^2## so you get $$
\Delta g = g(x+\Delta x ) - g(x) \approx g'(x) \Delta x \Rightarrow \\ = {-2\over x^3} \Delta x \Rightarrow {\Delta g\over g} = -2 {\Delta x\over x}$$

We usually report the standard deviation which is positive.
Thanks. What's the name of that rule and the equation you wrote?
I've totally forgotten it, so I'm asking for a reference to learn and review.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top