Height limitation for natural circulation thermosiphon

AI Thread Summary
In natural circulation thermosiphon systems, height limitations are primarily influenced by pressure differences and pipe losses. An elevated tank, such as one at 30 feet, can still function with a heat exchanger at ground level, but starting the thermosiphon may be more challenging due to increased pipe losses and reduced heating efficiency. The flow rate initially increases with height until the pressure difference can no longer overcome the system's resistance. Ultimately, while there is no strict height limit, practical considerations like heating efficiency and pressure drops play significant roles. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for effective system design and operation.
rollingstein
Messages
644
Reaction score
16
Suppose I have an overhead tank that heats hot water by natural circulation via a thermosiphon (& a Heat Exchanger with some source of waste heat), is there a limitation on how tall this loop can be?

e.g. Can there be an elevated tank at 30 feet with a heat exchanger at ground level that heats the water via a thermosiphon? What's the right way to analyse this?

Even more fundamentally, does a more elevated tank make a thermosiphon harder or easier to get going?
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
Not an expert but I can't think of a reason why there would be a limit on height (unless perhaps you want to heat a space station or something). As i recall the flow rate increases until the pressure difference (due to the different densities in each leg) can no longer overcome the pressure drops in the pipework. I think starting will be harder with height because the percentage of water heated is smaller yet pipe losses are higher.
 
  • Like
Likes rollingstein
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top