Height, time, gravity acceleration

AI Thread Summary
To determine how long it takes for a stone thrown upwards from a 29-meter building at 11 meters per second to hit the ground, the height equation s = 29 + 11t - 4.9t² is used. This leads to the quadratic equation -29 = 11t - 4.9t², which can be rearranged to 4.9t² - 11t - 29 = 0. The quadratic formula can be applied to find the time t, yielding two solutions, one of which will be negative and not applicable in this context. The correct positive solution, rounded to one decimal place, is approximately 3.8 seconds.
gigglin_horse
Messages
32
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


"A stone is thrown vertically upwards from the top of a building 29 metres high at an initial speed of 11 metres/sec. How long (in seconds) will it take the stone to hit the ground? The height at any time is given by

s = 29 + 11*t – 4.9*t2.

Give your answer correct to one rounded off decimal place (but don't round off as you work the problem), eg., 4.37 becomes 4.8."


Homework Equations



-29 = 11t - 4.9t^2
t(11 - 4.9t) = -29 <<< Do I do this? Do I need it?

The Attempt at a Solution


The answer is 3.801, but how do I get this?
Please help me
 
Physics news on Phys.org
gigglin_horse said:

Homework Statement


"A stone is thrown vertically upwards from the top of a building 29 metres high at an initial speed of 11 metres/sec. How long (in seconds) will it take the stone to hit the ground? The height at any time is given by

s = 29 + 11*t – 4.9*t2.

Give your answer correct to one rounded off decimal place (but don't round off as you work the problem), eg., 4.37 becomes 4.8."


Homework Equations



-29 = 11t - 4.9t^2

That's fine as far as it goes.

But what you have is a quadratic equation.

You can use the quadratic formula to solve the general equation:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quadratic_equation#Quadratic_formula

One of the answers will give you your solution. The other root of the equation is likely a (-) number, indicating another solution of different construction that would also satisfy the same quadratic relationship.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top