Rather the second one. Actually it simply says that you start with a state. Acting with an operator on it measures whatever the operator corresponds to (energy, momemntum,position etc) After the measurement the particle is in an eigenstate of that operator(one that corresponds to the eigenvalue you just measured). Now you want a second measurement, so you act with a second operator, different from the first. If the two operators commute, they may have a common set of eigenvectors(i.e. states), so acting on an eigenstate of the second operator with the second operator will measue the eigenvalue of the second operator, but not change the state. If they do not, then you will force the state to CHANGE into an eigenstate of the second operator and after your measurement you know the state and the value of the observable correspoinding to the second operator. But then, you do not know the value of the first, because the state that occurred when you did the first measurement has CHANGED
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles.
Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated...
Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/
by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
I don't know why the electrons in atoms are considered in the orbitals while they could be in sates which are superpositions of these orbitals? If electrons are in the superposition of these orbitals their energy expectation value is also constant, and the atom seems to be stable!