Heisenberg's Uncertainties, question

  • Thread starter Thread starter kanki
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Uncertainties
kanki
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
I'm so confused of the Heisenberg's Uncertainties...

Here's a question i have to solve, although it looks very easy but my understanding of Heisenberg's Uncertainties is still shallow.

Fuzzy a quantum mechanical duck lives in a world which h = 2 PI Js. Fuzzy has a mass of 2.0 kg and initially is known to be within a pond of 1m wide.
- The minimum uncertainty in his speed?
- Assuming the uncertainty in speed prevails for 5.0s, determine uncertainy in position after that time.

This is my attempt to solve the first one:
Of course I have to apply Heisenberg's Uncertainties here.
m x (uncertainties in speed) x (uncertainties in location) => h/4PI
the mass is 2.0kg, but the uncertainty in location, is it half of the width or it's the width??
I'm still not good in determining the uncertainties.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
i think it should be half the width. because the uncertainty can be positive and negative. Let's say a particle is observed to be at 0, the uncertainty is 1 unit, so the particle should be within [-1,1] (width 2 units)
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top