Heisenberg's uncertianty principle

  • Thread starter Thread starter Physicsiscool
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Principle
Physicsiscool
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Can anyone help me with this question?

A simple harmonic oscillator can be considered to be a small mass "m" on a spring of a force constant "k" when the force is f = -kx and the potential energy is V(x) = 1/2mw(squared)x(squared) where w = square root of (k/m)

Knowing this I need to show that the minimum value for the energy of the ocillator is E (min) = h(bar) * w
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Physicsiscool said:
Can anyone help me with this question?

A simple harmonic oscillator can be considered to be a small mass "m" on a spring of a force constant "k" when the force is f = -kx and the potential energy is V(x) = 1/2mw(squared)x(squared) where w = square root of (k/m)

That's correct.

Physicsiscool said:
Knowing this I need to show that the minimum value for the energy of the ocillator is E (min) = h(bar) * w

That's wrong,unless you screw up calculations and end up with the wrong formula written above.The right one is,of course,E_{0}=\frac{\hbar\omega}{2}.It's called the vacuum energy of the oscillator and it's a pure quantum effect.
Quantum mechanics books find this by two methons.Using Schroedinger's equation or using creation+annihilation operators.The latter is more elegant.The former requires lots of calculating.
Good luck!
 
/2

Sure, I can help explain Heisenberg's uncertainty principle in relation to the simple harmonic oscillator.

First, it's important to understand that the uncertainty principle is a fundamental principle in quantum mechanics that states that it is impossible to know both the precise position and momentum of a particle at the same time. In other words, the more precisely we know the position of a particle, the less we know about its momentum, and vice versa. This is represented by the famous equation:

Δx * Δp ≥ h/2π

where Δx is the uncertainty in position, Δp is the uncertainty in momentum, and h is Planck's constant.

Now, in the case of the simple harmonic oscillator, the position of the mass is given by x = A sin(wt), where A is the amplitude of the oscillation and w is the angular frequency. The momentum is given by p = m*w*A*cos(wt).

Using the uncertainty principle, we can say that the product of the uncertainties in position and momentum must be greater than or equal to h/2π.

Δx * Δp ≥ h/2π

Substituting in the equations for position and momentum, we get:

Δx * m*w*A*cos(wt) ≥ h/2π

Now, the maximum value for cos(wt) is 1, which occurs when wt = 0. This means that the minimum uncertainty in momentum occurs at the point when the mass is at its maximum displacement, A.

So, we can rewrite the equation as:

Δx * m*w*A ≥ h/2π

Recall that w = √(k/m), so we can substitute that in:

Δx * m*w*A ≥ h/2π

Δx * m*√(k/m)*A ≥ h/2π

Simplifying, we get:

Δx * √(k*m) ≥ h/2π

Now, we know that the potential energy of the oscillator is given by V(x) = 1/2*m*w^2*x^2. We can rearrange this equation to solve for w and substitute it into our inequality:

w = √(k/m)

w^2 = k/m

√(k*m) = w

Substituting into our inequality, we get:

Δ
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top