Helicity states degrees of freedom

Neitrino
Messages
133
Reaction score
0
Hello,

1)Why does the number of helicity states depend on space-time dimension ?

Masselss graviton in 4 dimensional space has 2 helicity states ( 2 degrees of freedom). In 5 dimensional space it has (still massless in 5 D) 5 helicity states (5 degrees of freedom) ...

In 6 dimesional space according to formula d(d-3)/2 it has 9 helicity states ... but beeing a particle of spin s=2 it has 2s+1=5 states so where from are the additional 4 helicity states...

thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Neitrino said:
Hello,

1)Why does the number of helicity states depend on space-time dimension ?

Masselss graviton in 4 dimensional space has 2 helicity states ( 2 degrees of freedom). In 5 dimensional space it has (still massless in 5 D) 5 helicity states (5 degrees of freedom) ...

In 6 dimesional space according to formula d(d-3)/2 it has 9 helicity states ... but beeing a particle of spin s=2 it has 2s+1=5 states so where from are the additional 4 helicity states...

thanks

If you recall that in 4d for the photon only 2 transverse modes which can be picturized to be the left and right circularly polarized. For d-dimensions there are d-2 transverse directions and so according to me the number of degrees of freedom i.e. the number of helicities ought to be 2 * (no. of polarizations mixing two transverse directions) = 2* (d-2)(d-3)/2= (d-2)(d-3). Can you refer me the text/paper from where you quoted the helicities = d*(d-3)/2 formula.
 
Tomas Ortin gravity and strings page 295
 
Neitrino said:
Tomas Ortin gravity and strings page 295

Ah I see that now. Thats just the number of independent components (polarizations) of an (p+1)-antisymmetric tensor in (d-2) transverse dimensions i.e. (d-2) C _(p+1) = (d-2)!/(p+1)!(d-p-3)! while the massive case you can have longitudinal modes so you count the number of components of an antisymmetric tensor with (p+1) indices in (d-1) spatial directions i.e. (d-1)C_(p+1).
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...

Similar threads

Back
Top